检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴为卿 DAI Weiqing(University of Sanya,Sanya,Haikou 572022,China)
机构地区:[1]三亚学院,海南三亚572022
出 处:《食品与机械》2025年第3期62-66,共5页Food and Machinery
摘 要:随着全球以人工智能AI为代表的数字科技发展,基于环保压力如替代蛋白减少碳排放、可持续包装降低塑料污染、健康意识增强等多方面的考量,美国、欧盟、新加坡、日本等国家在国际新兴食品领域如替代蛋白、功能性食品、3D打印食品的法律监管方面形成了比较富有成效的制度机制。对比来看,中国在新兴食品领域的法律监管目前仍存在分类监管比较模糊、审批效率偏低、国际规则衔接不足、监管政策呈现滞后性等问题。文章在有选择性借鉴美国、欧盟、新加坡、日本等国际经验做法的基础上,从建立分级分类监管体系、优化审批与创新激励机制、加强跨部门与国际协作、动态调整监管政策等不同维度对中国的新兴食品领域的法律监管进行了审视并给予完善的建议。With the development of digital technologies represented by artificial intelligence AI globally,and considering environmental pressures such as reducing carbon emissions from alternative proteins,sustainable packaging to reduce plastic pollution and health awareness,countries like the United States,the European Union,Singapore,and Japan have established relatively effective legal frameworks for emerging food fields including alternative proteins,functional foods,and 3D-printed foods.In contrast,China's legal supervision in the emerging food field currently faces issues such as vague classification supervision,low approval efficiency,insufficient alignment with international rules,and lagging supervision policies.To address these challenges,this paper selectively draws on the experiences of countries like the United States,the European Union,Singapore,and Japan.It reviews and gives suggestions to improve China's legal supervision in the emerging food fields from aspects such as establishing a hierarchical and categorized supervision system,optimizing approval processes and innovation incentives,enhancing inter-departmental and international cooperation,and dynamically adjusting supervision policies.
关 键 词:国际新兴食品 法律监管 分级分类监管体系 国际协作 动态调整监管政策
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13