检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李欢欢 LI Huanhuan(School of Political Science and Public Administration,Shandong University,Qingdao 266200,China)
机构地区:[1]山东大学政治学与公共管理学院,山东青岛266200
出 处:《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期53-62,共10页Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(24CZZ033);山东省自然科学基金青年项目(ZR2023QG172);山东大学国家治理研究院课题项目(23B03)。
摘 要:城市治理数字化转型是城市响应中央关于“网络强国、数字中国、智慧社会”建设的重要抓手。采用多案例比较研究方法,基于技术、组织、环境(TOE)理论对上海、北京、杭州的城市治理数字化转型进行剖析,总结转型模式,归纳建构逻辑。研究发现,上海是政府主导下的技术性变革模式,北京是治理机制创新的制度性变革模式,杭州是政企合作推动下的技术性变革模式。虽然转型方式和侧重点不同,但可以从中溯源转型的构建逻辑,城市治理数字化转型的关键在于技术赋能、组织促进,城市根据环境优势选择转型措施。城市治理数字化转型没有固定模式,需要“量体裁衣”。研究结论有助于城市在“数字中国”战略下更有针对性地制定数字化转型方案,明确自身转型路径。In recent years,promoting the digital transformation of city governance has become a typical trend.Under the strategic background of building a digital China,the digital transformation of city governance is an important starting point for the city to respond to the central government’s construction of“network state,digital China,and smart society”,which is the core carrier of the construction of digital China,and is a reform of city operation in the digital era.However,there is a lack of existing literature to analyze the digital transformation path,especially the lack of analysis of influencing factors and practice process,as well as the transformation models and internal logic.Based on the TOE theory(technology-organization-environment),this study adopts a multi cases comparative study method to summarize paths and methods of digital transformation of city governance from the specific cases of Shanghai,Beijing and Hangzhou from the three dimensions of technology,organization and environment.This study finds that there is no optimal plan,which needs to be acted according to actual circumstances.The key to digital transformation lies in technology empowerment,organizational change,and the selection flexible measures based on environmental advantages.Compared to the previous literature,the value of this study is reflected in three aspects.Firstly,the topic is valuable,and the study of digital transformation is of epochal significance.The practice in Shanghai,Beijing and Hangzhou shows that digital transformation is the core driving force for city development,and it is also the way to promote the modernization of city governance.Secondly,there is theoretical innovation.Compared to previous single case studies,this study adopts a multi cases comparative research method to analyze various models and construction logic of urban governance digital transformation.Thirdly,there is practical value.The differences in urban environment,resource endowment,technological foundation,and other factors have led to differenc
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33