检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨建竹 杨苗芬 YANG Jianzhu;YANG Miaofen(Zhangzhou Xiangcheng District People’s Court,Zhangzhou,Fujian 363000,China)
出 处:《漳州职业技术学院学报》2025年第1期75-80,共6页Journal of Zhangzhou Institute of Technology
摘 要:我国探望权适用的前提单一、对于行使探望权的权利主体适用范围过于狭窄、父母“权利本位”仍占据主导地位及探望权行使方式模糊等,导致司法实践中对于探望权出现许多同案不同判的现象,造成当事人在行使探望权过程矛盾加深、激化,甚至造成了较为严重的社会问题。作者从将父母“权利本位”转化为“义务本位”、探望权主体范围应适当放宽、探望权适用前提应做扩大解释等方面提出了进一步完善探望权制度的措施,以期探望权制度在我国法律与道德的框架下能够被正确主张。The premise for the application of visitation rights in our country is overly simplistic,with a narrow scope for their exercise.The prevailing focus on parents’“rights-based”perspectives often dominates,while the methods for exercising these rights remain vague.This has resulted in inconsistent judgments in judicial practice regarding visitation rights,leading to escalating conflicts between parties and even contributing to serious social problems.To improve the visitation rights system,the author proposes several measures:transforming the focus from parents’“rights-based”to“obligation-based”approaches,appropriately relaxing the scope of visitation rights,and expanding the interpretation of the prerequisites for their application.These changes aim to ensure that the visitation rights system is effectively advocated within the framework of Chinese law and morality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15