逆被动化视角下汉语及物动词带旁格宾语结构研究  

An Antipassive Analysis of Oblique Object Constructions with Transitive Verbs in Mandarin Chinese

作　　者：谭泓亮 TAN Hong-liang

机构地区：[1]浙江大学外国语学院,浙江杭州310023

出　　处：《外语导刊》2025年第2期31-40,158,共11页Foreign Languages Bimonthly

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“跨语言比较视域下的汉语论元交替现象研究”(23AYY014)。

摘　　要：本文考察汉语及物动词带旁格宾语结构,论证其所展现出的性质源自两个核心过程:首先,逆被动化抑制直接宾语;其次,高阶施用引入旁格宾语,占据焦点位置。本文对三类结构进行了统一分析,包括“动词+旁格宾语”“(直接宾语)+动词+(直接宾语)+旁格宾语”和“动词+并入名词+旁格宾语”,并提出,由于“动后限制”,原有的直接宾语只能通过以下三种形式之一出现:?(隐性逆被动化语素)、附加语(内/外话题)、并入名词。这些策略均可在逆被动化框架下获得解释。This paper examines structures in which transitive verbs take oblique objects(e.g.,chi shítáng'eat in a dining hall')and argues that their properties stem from two core processes.First,antipassivization,which suppresses the original direct object.Second,high applicatives,which introduce the oblique object in a focus position.A unified analysis is proposed for three types of structures:"verb+oblique object","(direct object)+verb+(direct object)+oblique object",and"verb+incorporated noun+oblique object".The paper further argues that,due to the Postverbal Structure Constraint,the original direct object can only surface in one of three forms:?(a covert reverse passivization morpheme),adjuncts(internal/external topics),or incorporated nouns.All these strategies are shown to be accounted for in the framework of antipassivization.

关 键 词：分布式形态学 旁格宾语 逆被动化 名词并入 施用结构 动后限制 汉语及物动词 

分 类 号：H146.3[语言文字—汉语]