检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁帅 YUAN Shuai
机构地区:[1]吉林大学法学院
出 处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第2期107-121,共15页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“支持全面创新的知识产权制度体系构建研究”(23&ZD161)。
摘 要:作为企业数据权益私人保护手段的技术措施,在带来积极效果的同时也会因滥用产生负面效应。过于强调企业数据权益的私权属性、企业数据权益反不正当竞争法保护路径的固有弊端以及网络环境变化引起的技术恶性竞争是企业数据权益私人保护中技术措施滥用产生的诱因。技术措施滥用行为主要包括通过滥用技术措施扩张企业数据权益、排除限制数据竞争、滋生数据垄断等情形,已经对企业数据权益制度构建、数据有序流转以及数据价值释放产生了消极影响。“技术-法律”协同规制契合滥用成因、符合规制需求,是企业数据权益私人保护中技术措施滥用规制的应然路径。通过法律指引技术,可以还原技术措施的法律定位,澄清破坏、绕开技术措施行为的理论与实践误区;通过技术嵌入法律,可以识别技术措施的保护对象,进而实现对破坏、绕开技术措施抓取数据行为的区分评价。Technical measures are technical means of protecting enterprise data.There are three primary inducements for the abuse of technical measures.First,in the practice of judicial protection of enterprise data rights,excessive emphasis is placed on the object attribute of private rights of enterprise data.Second,there are inherent drawbacks in protecting corporate data rights through the Anti-Unfair Competition Law,and the appearance of“improper form”easily obscures problems such as inconsistent protection objects and too broad protection interests.Third,changes in the network environment have triggered vicious competition in technology and intensified the abuse of technological measures.The abuse of technical measures mainly includes three typical situations.First,the improper expansion of the scope of protection for corporate data rights breaks through the effectiveness of the“limited exclusivity”of rights.Second,through technical measures,“point-to-point”excluding the use of public data by specific competitive entities is achieved.Third,data companies rely on their advantages in data stock and holding to implement horizontal monopolies,vertical monopolies,and other monopolistic behaviors.Separate legal governance of the abuse of technical measures in the private protection of corporate data rights may conflict with technical logic,and separate technical governance may fall into a legal crisis due to the personal biases of the implementers.“Technical-legal”collaborative regulation is in line with the causes of the abuse of technical measures,helping resolve the value conflict between technology and law and recalibrate the scale of private remedies.It meets the regulatory needs of seeking a balance between technology and law in the abuse of technical measures.The path of“technology-law”collaborative regulation of the abuse of technological measures can be carried out from two aspects.First,the law should guide the technology,clarify the instrumental status of technological measures,and undermine a
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222