经济学研究中的“实证计量”过盛——本质背离、负面影响、成因与变革方向  

Excessive“empirical measurement”in Economic research——essential deviation,negative influence,causes and direction of change

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:张宇青 林乐芬 杜立辉 刘蓓蕾 ZHANG Yu-qing;LIN Le-fen;DU Li-hui;LIU Bei-lei(School of Finance and Economics,Anhui University of Science and Technology,Bengbu Anhui 233000,China;School of Finance,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210095,China;School of Business,Anhui University of Technology,Maanshan Anhui 243032,China)

机构地区:[1]安徽科技学院财经学院,安徽蚌埠233000 [2]南京农业大学金融学院,江苏南京210095 [3]安徽工业大学商学院,安徽马鞍山243032

出  处:《科学管理研究》2025年第2期49-58,共10页Scientific Management Research

基  金:国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(编号:19FJYB002)。

摘  要:当前经济学研究中“实证计量”过盛现象一定程度上制约了新时期具有中国特色的本土经济学构建。计量分析工具及范式在揭示经济现象中的因果关系和规律发现上有着其重要价值,但从运用角度看在“科学发现功能不高”“资源配置功能不足”“过于线性化”“只经世不济民”等方面与经济学初衷存在本质背离;“实证计量”过盛会产生滞后范式创新、隐形剽窃、降低人才培养质量、科研资源错配等一系列负面作用;过盛的原因可归结为“科研主体的路径依赖”“期刊偏好”“产众研分割”“有组织科研缺失”,应从倡导具有主体性和原创性研究、加强计量工具使用规制、建立“稳态经济”导向的系统研究、创新科研评价机制、推进有组织的科研等角度促进经济学研究的变革。The phenomenon of excessive"empirical measurement"in current economic research restricts the construction of local economics with China characteristics in the new period to some extent.Econometric analysis tools and paradigms are of great value in revealing the causal relationship and law discovery in economic phenomena,but from the perspective of application,they are essentially different from the original intention of economics in terms of"low function of scientific discovery","insficient function of resource allocation","over-linearization"and"only doing the world without benefiting the people".The"empirical measurement"has a series of negative effects,such as lagging paradigm innovation,invisible plagiarism,lowering the quality of personnel training and mismatch of scientific research resources.The reasons for the excesscan be atiuled"path deendene fscientfc researchsubjesperiodia eferene","separationof produ tion from public research"and"lack of organized scientific research".We should promote the reform of economic research from the perspectives of advocating subjective and original research,strengthening the regulation of the use of measuring tools,establishing a"steady economy"-oriented systematic research,innovating scientific research evaluation mechanism and promoting organized scientific research.

关 键 词:“实证计量” 过盛 本质背离 负面作用 变革 

分 类 号:G312[文化科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象