检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李瑞寅 Ruiyin Li(School of Marine Law and Humanities,Dalian Ocean University,Dalian Liaoning)
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2025年第3期525-529,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:互联网信息时代新形势下,基于数据海量特征及司法实践通行做法于法有据之需要,公民个人信息真伪举证责任应当引入举证责任倒置规则。从适应当前严厉打击侵犯公民个人信息犯罪的政策需求角度看,在某些情况下“被他人用于犯罪”为该类型犯罪的加重情节或构成要件,该设计具有合理性。仅以违法所得数额作为入罪门槛违反刑事目的解释原则,应当采用“数量+情节”模式。对于近来各地试行的违法违约信息公开机制,应当对限制对象和公开范围加以区分。Under the new situation of the Internet information age,based on the characteristics of massive data and the need of legal basis of the common practice of judicial practice,the burden of proof of citizens’personal information should be introduced to reverse the burden of proof.From the perspective of adapting to the current policy needs of severely cracking down on the crime of infringing citizens’personal information,the design of the objective punishment conditions of the“used by others to commit acrime”clause is reasonable.Taking only the amount of illegal gains as the threshold of crime violates the principle of interpretation of criminal purposes,and the mode of“quantitative circumstances”should be adopted.The scope and object of disclosure of illegal and breach of contract information that have been tried out in recent years should be differentiated.Copyright©2025 by author(s)and Hans Publishers Inc.This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License(CC BY 4.0).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26