印加主流媒体关于“锡克教领袖暗杀事件”报道的话语分析——以《印度时报》和《环球邮报》为例  

Discourse Analysis of Indian and Candian Major Media on the“Sikh Leader Assassination”:A Case study of The Times of India and The Globe and Mail

作　　者：董雪飞[1] 刘真 DONG Xuefei;LIU Zhen(Sichuan International Studies University,Chongqing,400031)

机构地区：[1]四川外国语大学,重庆市400031

出　　处：《中外交流研究(中英文)》2025年第2期49-59,共11页

摘　　要：印度和加拿大虽同为英联邦国家,但是两国在外交上一直争端不断。加籍锡克教领袖尼贾尔遭暗杀一事再次将印加关系推入纷争的漩涡。加方坚决维护国内锡克教徒的判利和自由,印方则指责加方支持或纵容恐怖主义和分裂主义。印加在锡克教问题上的立场是理解印加关系,乃至印度在全球权力版图中自我定位的一个有力视角。本研究以印加主流媒体《印度时报》和《环球邮报》关于“锡克教领袖暗杀事件”的报道为研究对象,以批评话语分析理论为基础,对两大媒体的报道进行话语分析。研究发现,双方媒体在报道内容和形态、身份构建上存在显著差异。《印度时报》相关报道紧跟政府态度,忽视了锡克教群体的复杂性,过度强调印度的利益和立场,缺乏客观性和公正性;《环球邮报》的报道则过度重视本国的规则和程序,忽视了印度的真实情况,缺乏敏感性和关切性。India and Canada,as Commonwealth countries,have been in a constant complex diplomatic relationship.Recently,these two countries have been trapped in a spiral of strife over the assassination of Canadian Sikh leader Nijjar.While Canada strongly defends the rights and freedom of their Sikhs,India accuses that Canada supports or indulges terrorism and separatism.The standpoint of these two countries in Sikhism is the key to understand the relationship of India-Canada,and even India̓s self-positioning in the global power map.This study takes The Times of India and The Globe and Mail,the mainstream media of India and Canada,as the objects,and analyzes the discourse of the news reports of the two newspapers based on T.A.van Dijk̓s critical discourse analysis theory.The study finds that these two media are different in terms of content,form of coverage,and the construction of identities.The Times of India followed their government.Its reports neglected the complexity of the Sikh community,overemphasized India̓s own interest and position and lacked objectivity and impartiality.The Globe and Mail too emphasized their country̓s principles and procedures,and it ignored the reality about India,lacking sensitivity.

关 键 词：锡克教 《印度时报》 《环球邮报》 新闻话语 批评话语分析 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]