机构地区:[1]仙居县人民医院(浙江省人民医院浙东南院区/杭州医学院附属仙居医院),浙江仙居317300
出 处:《中国康复》2025年第4期202-206,共5页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation
基 金:浙江省中医药项目(2022ZA186)。
摘 要:目的:观察脊激肌技术联合重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗对脑卒中后睡眠障碍(SD)及心理障碍的疗效。方法:选取2023年5月~2024年3月我院收治的90例脑卒中后SD患者,随机分为手法组、rTMS组、联合组3组,每组30例。3组分别脱落2例、1例、1例,最终分别为28例、29例、29例。3组均采用常规治疗,在此基础上,手法组予以脊激肌技术治疗,30min/d,6d/周,共4周;rTMS组予以rTMS治疗,20min/d,6d/周,共4周;联合组予以rTMS+脊激肌技术治疗,50min/d,6d/周,共4周。分别评估3组患者治疗前后的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分以及多导睡眠监测参数(觉醒次数、睡眠效率、睡眠潜伏期、睡眠总时间)并进行比较。结果:治疗前,3组上述各项结果比较无统计学差异。经过4周治疗后,3组患者PSQI、HAMD、HAMA评分、觉醒次数、睡眠潜伏期均较治疗前降低(P<0.05);睡眠效率、睡眠总时间均较治疗前升高(P<0.05);联合组PSQI、HAMD、HAMA评分、觉醒次数、睡眠潜伏期低于手法组、rTMS组(P<0.05);联合组睡眠效率、睡眠总时间高于手法组、rTMS组(P<0.05);rTMS组与手法组PSQI、IHAMD、HAMA评分及多导睡眠监测参数比较差异无统计学意义。结论:脊激肌技术、rTMS联合治疗较单用脊激肌技术、rTMS治疗可更有效地改善脑卒中患者的SD,缓解患者的抑郁和焦虑。Objective:To observe the impact of spine nerves muscle stimulation combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)on post-stroke sleep disorders(SD)and psychological status.Methods:From May 2023 to March 2024,90 patients with post-stroke SD admitted to our hospital were selected and randomly divided into three groups:manual therapy group,rTMS group,and combined group,with 30 patients in each group.However,2 patients dropped out from the manual therapy group,1 from the rTMS group,and 1 from the combined group,leaving 28,29,and 29 patients in each group respectively.All groups received conventional treatment.Additionally,the manual therapy group received spine nerves muscle stimulation for 30 min/day,6 days/week for 4 weeks;the rTMS group received rTMS for 20 min/day,6 days/week for 4 weeks;and the combined group received both rTMS and spine nerves muscle stimulation for 50 min/day,6 days/week for 4 weeks.The Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI),Hamilton depression scale(HAMD),Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA),and polysomnography parameters(arousal index,sleep efficiency,sleep latency,and total sleep time)were evaluated and compared before and after treatment in all groups.Results:Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in the aforementioned outcomes among the three groups.After 4 weeks of treatment,the PSQI,HAMD,HAMA scores,arousal index,and sleep latency decreased in all groups compared to baseline(P<0.05),while sleep efficiency and total sleep time increased(P<0.05).The PSQI,HAMD,HAMA scores,arousal index,and sleep latency were lower in the combined group than in the manual therapy and rTMS groups(P<0.05).Additionally,the sleep efficiency and total sleep time parameters were higher in the combined group than in the manual therapy and rTMS groups(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in PSQI,HAMD,HAMA scores,or polysomnography parameters between the rTMS group and the manual therapy group.Conclusion:Compared with spine nerves muscle stimulation or rTM
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...