中国刑法适用研究述评(2024年)  

A Review of Research on the Application of China's Criminal Law(2024)

作　　者：赖早兴[1] 胡云腾[2,3] Lai Zaoxing;Hu Yunteng

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学部 [2]最高人民法院咨询委员会 [3]中国法学会案例法学研究会

出　　处：《法治现代化研究》2025年第2期24-43,共20页Law and Modernization

摘　　要：2024年刑法学者从司法适用的角度对刑法热点问题进行了多维研究,成果聚焦于以下几个方面:在民营企业权益的刑法平等保护上,探讨了民营企业中的犯罪主体、行为人“利用职务便利”以及行为造成重大损失的认定标准;在刑民关系的处理上,从实体和程序两个层面进行了分析与探讨;在正当防卫认定上,分析了公力救济与私力救济的关系,探讨了防卫限度的原则以及特殊防卫的认定;轻罪治理方面,对当前治理理念进行了反思,提出了合理的治理模式与实体制度;在数据的刑法保护方面,解析了数据的概念,强调刑法适用中要注重辨析数据的属性与价值;在个人信息保护方面,明确了个人信息的范围以及侵犯行为的认定标准,提出了基于知情同意的出罪机制;在污染环境罪的认定中,研究了行为人的主观心态、污染环境中的因果关系和违法性认定的标准,并分析了污染环境罪中的竞合问题;在行贿罪的从重处罚方面,探讨了立法与司法解释之间的关系,分析了从重处罚的适用原则及特殊情形的处理。总体而言,这些研究成果为刑法的正确适用提供了多元的理论视角和智力支持。In 2024,criminal law academics conducted multidimensional studies on critical issues in criminal law from the perspective of judicial application.Their research centered on the following key themes.Regarding the equal protection of private enterprise rights under criminal law,they examined the criminal liability of individuals in private enterprises,the interpretation of“using one's position for convenience”,and the standards for determining significant losses caused by actions.The relationship between criminal and civil law was explored through substantive and procedural analysis.On the issue of justifiable defense,the criminal law academics delved into the interplay between public and private remedies,the principles defining the limits of defense,and the criteria for identifying special defense scenarios.Reflections on the governance of minor offenses led to proposals for improved governance models and substantive systems.In the context of data protection under criminal law,the concept of data was analyzed with a focus on distinguishing its attributes and value in legal applications.For personal information protection,they clarified the scope of personal information,established criteria for determining infringements,and proposed an exemption mechanism based on informed consent.In addressing environmental pollution crimes,they examined the offenders'subjective intent,the causal relationships inherent in environmental pollution,and standards for determining illegality.In the determination of environmental pollution crimes,their research examined the subjective mindset of offenders,the causal relationships involved in environmental pollution,and the standards for identifying illegality.Additionally,the issues of concurrence within environmental pollution crimes were also analyzed.On the topic of aggravated punishment for bribery,they explored the relationship between legislative provisions and judicial interpretations,assessed the principles governing the application of aggravated punishment,and considered the

关 键 词：刑法适用 热点问题 实务研究 2024年 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]