检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈云樵[1] 谢梓菁 SHEN Yunqiao;XIE Zijing(Faculty of Law,Macao University of Science and Technology,Macao 999078,China)
出 处:《西南政法大学学报》2025年第2期15-27,共13页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“竞争中立规则下国家股东控制权规制研究”(22BFX195)。
摘 要:我国《公司法》以“弘扬企业家精神”为立法目的之一,彰显了激发经济发展创新活力的立法导向,但企业家和企业家精神极具抽象性,在现有公司法体系中难以界定,亦无须界定。在法经济学视角下,弘扬企业家精神的目的是降低交易成本,以达到提高市场效率、促进经济发展的效果。弘扬企业家精神,公司治理模式需要走向企业家中心主义。以弘扬企业家精神为主观条件,以公司控制权激励为客观条件,通过二者良性的互动演进才能激发市场活力。我国需要在中国特色语境下,重视企业家精神与公司控制权的互动调适,以缓和弘扬企业家精神过程中公司控制权规范群的内部张力,从而在企业家精神的激励和约束中寻求平衡。and difficult to delineate within the existing corporate law framework—and,indeed,such rigid definitions may be unnecessary.From a law and economics perspective,the underlying rationale for promoting entrepreneurship is to reduce transaction costs,thereby enhancing market efficiency and stimulating economic development.A governance model centered on entrepreneurship is essential to achieving this goal.Unlocking market vitality requires the dynamic interplay between entrepreneurship promotion as a subjective condition and corporate control incentives as an objective condition.Within the Chinese legal and economic context,it is imperative to recognize and refine the interaction between entrepreneurial dynamics and corporate control mechanisms.This adaptation serves to alleviate the internal tensions within the regulatory framework governing corporate control while striking a balance between incentivizing and constraining entrepreneurial behavior.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7