跨境腐败域外管辖的学理重构与机制建设  

Theoretical Reconstruction and Mechanism Development of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction over Cross-Border Corruption

作　　者：王玉婷 WANG Yuting(School of Law,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学法学院,北京102488

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2025年第2期70-87,共18页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“涉外法治体系建设中的管辖权演化规则研究”(23BFX145)。

摘　　要：近代以来,属地原则是主权国家行使管辖权的基础法律依据。随着全球化和数字化时代的到来,属地原则难以适应跨境腐败治理的现实需求。《联合国反腐败公约》与《禁止在国际商业交易中贿赂外国公职人员公约》为各国针对跨境腐败的管辖权的域外拓展提供了法律依据。但域外管辖本身依旧存在合法性困境,因其产生的管辖冲突不仅对国际秩序造成冲击,还可能对私人权利造成不当损害,违背法治原则。鉴于此,在拓展域外管辖权时,国家应合理约束其管辖权,完善跨境腐败管辖协调与合作机制,并以正当程序保障跨境腐败域外管辖的实施。在反跨境腐败法立法中,我国可通过“实质联系”的方法拓展针对跨境腐败的域外管辖权,同时切实履行《联合国反腐败公约》下的相关义务,进一步完善跨境腐败治理的机制建设。Historically,the principle of territoriality has served as the fundamental legal basis for sovereign states to exercise jurisdiction.However,in the era of globalization and digitalization,this principle has proven inadequate for addressing the complexities of cross-border corruption governance.The United Nations Convention Against Corruption and the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention provide a legal foundation for states to extend their jurisdiction over transnational corruption.Nevertheless,extraterritorial jurisdiction remains fraught with legitimacy challenges,as the jurisdictional conflicts it engenders not only disrupt the international legal order but may also unduly infringe upon private rights,thereby contravening the rule of law.In light of these concerns,states must impose reasonable constraints on their jurisdictional reach,enhance coordination and cooperation mechanisms for cross-border corruption governance,and ensure that extraterritorial jurisdiction is exercised in strict adherence to due process.In shaping China’s anti-transnational corruption legal framework,the adoption of the“substantial connection”doctrine could serve as a means to expand extraterritorial jurisdiction while fulfilling the country’s obligations under the United Nations Convention Against Corruption.Further institutional refinements are necessary to enhance the effectiveness of cross-border corruption governance.

关 键 词：跨境腐败 域外管辖 反跨境腐败法 《联合国反腐败公约》 实质联系 

分 类 号：DF94[政治法律—国际法学]