北约智库对认知战的理解与应用:一项系统性评价研究  

Review of NATO Think Tanks’Research on Cognitive Warfare

作　　者：韩志宇 韩娜[1,2] 朱睿琳 Han Zhiyu;Han Na;Zhu Ruilin(School of National Security,People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038;Research Base on International Governance of Cyberspace,People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038;School of Broadcasting andHosting Arts,CommunicationUniversity of China,Beijing 100024)

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学国家安全学院,北京100038 [2]中国人民公安大学网络空间国际治理研究基地,北京100038 [3]中国传媒大学播音主持艺术学院,100024

出　　处：《智库理论与实践》2025年第2期116-126,共11页Think Tank:Theory & Practice

基　　金：中国人民公安大学国家安全战略双一流创新研究专项(编号:2023SYL17)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]北约是认知战领域的先行者和集大成者,本文旨在深入分析北约智库对认知战的最新研究成果并进行研究评析,以期为中国研判北约国家的认知战战略提供参考,并为我国应对北约对华认知战提供对策建议。[方法/过程]本文通过选取11家北约权威智库自2022年1月以来的56篇代表性文献作为样本,运用文献分析法,对北约智库在认知战相关议题上的研究进行梳理,分析其总体特征、形成原因及可能影响。[结果/结论]北约智库对认知战的研究主要集中在认知战的本体、特征和战略目标等方面,呈现出进攻性、偏见性、价值观传播等特点。这些研究结果受到认知作战杀伤力、意识形态偏见和战略属性等因素的影响,对政府决策咨询、价值观传播和对华政策制定等方面产生了影响。在此背景下,我国应采取积极措施,从理论、科技、战略和国际合作四个层面推动我国在认知战领域的发展。[Purpose/Significance]As a pioneer and leading authority in cognitive warfare,this paper aims to analyze the latest research results of NATO think tanks on cognitive warfare and conducts a cognitive analysis,with a view to providing a reference framework for China to assess NATO countries’cognitve warfare strategies and offering countermeasures and suggestions for addressing NATO’s cognitive warfare against China.[Method/Process]This study adopts a document analysis approach,selecting 56 representative documents from 11 authoritative NATO-affiliated think tanks released since January 2022.By systematically reviewing these documents,this study identifies key themes related to cognitive warfare,examines their overarching characteristics,formation reasons and potential impacts.[Result/Conclusion]NATO think tanks’research on cognitive warfare primarily focuses on the ontology,characteristics,and strategic goals of cognitive warfare,presenting characteristics such as offensive and biased.The results of these studies are affected by cognitive combat lethality,ideological bias and strategic attributes,etc.,which have an impact on the government’s decision-making consulting,values dissemination and policy making towards China.In this context,China should take active measures to promote China’s development in the field of cognitive warfare at the four levels of theory,science and technology,strategy,and international cooperation.

关 键 词：智库 认知战 北约 对华战略 

分 类 号：C932[经济管理—管理学] E161[军事—军事理论] E86