司法回应社会诉求的行为策略与风险消解  

Behavioral Strategies and Risk Elimination in Judicial Response to Social Appeals

作　　者：侯明明 Hou Mingming

机构地区：[1]吉林大学理论法学研究中心、吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2025年第2期180-189,共10页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：中国法学会部级法学研究课题(CLS2021D12)“司法回应社会诉求中的行为策略与风险消解——基于法官个体与法院整体的二元划分”;吉林省社会科学基金博士和青年扶持项目(2021C64)“优化营商环境下司法改革在诚信政府建设中的功能研究”。

摘　　要：从内部构成上看,狭义上的司法主体可以进一步分解为个体意义上的法官与组织结构意义上的法院。这种二元划分在我国现行有效的法律规范体系、司法改革实践以及涉案当事人与普通社会公众的认知偏差中得以明显地体现。因为司法功能的发挥必须以一定的组织结构作为基础,所以当代中国司法回应社会诉求时,很多情形下都是以法院整体的组织结构作为司法运作的后台和支撑,而非仅以法官个体的单方行为为支撑。在法官个体和法院整体二元主体的互动下,司法回应社会诉求时会以制度行动者的角色采取行为策略,其中压制性回应策略以及转移性回应策略可能会衍生出一定的风险。为了消解可能存在的风险,需要以法院整体为本位、以法官个体为主导,对二元主体进行多维度的关系优化和结构完善,最终迈向以法官为主导的法院整体本位主义,这样才能真正实现司法正义、司法效率与社会诉求之供需匹配下的融洽。From the perspective of internal structure,justice in the narrow sense can be further divided into judge in the sense of individual and court in the sense of organizational structure.This binary division can be clearly reflected in the current legal norm system,the judicial reform practice,and the cognitive deviation between the parties to the case and the general public.Because the judicial function must have a certain organizational structure as the foundation,contemporary Chinese justice responds to social demands with the overall organizational structure of the court as the background and support for its operation,rather than just unilateral behavior by individual judge.Under the interaction between the individual judge and the court as a whole,the judiciary will adopt behavioral strategies in the role of institutional actors when responding to social demands.The repressive response strategy and the transferable response strategy may in turn derive certain risks.In order to eliminate the possible risks,it is necessary to take the court-oriented mode and take the judge as the leading factor,and carry out multi-dimensional relationship optimization and structural improvement of the binary subject.Only by moving towards the court-oriented mode dominated by judges who perform the actual function of trial can we really achieve harmonious coexistence under the matching of judicial supply and social demands.

关 键 词：回应型司法 法官个体 法院整体 司法决策 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学]