《资治通鉴》长编分修问题新探  

A Research on Separate Compilation of the Long Drafts of ZIZHITONGJIAN

作　　者：李全德[1] Li Quande

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学历史学院,北京100872

出　　处：《史学史研究》2025年第1期111-122,共12页Journal of Historiography

摘　　要：《资治通鉴》编纂过程中的长编分工及编定先后是两个争议较多的问题,议论纷纭之故在于对相关的核心史料即司马光分别写给范祖禹、刘恕的《修书帖》和《与刘道原书》二帖的写作时间与内容理解不同。通过对此二帖的重新解读可知《与刘道原书》中的刘恕负责的“五代长编”是指五代十国的长编而非“前五代”长编,其修成次序在南北朝长编之后。《通鉴》书局成立后其编纂和长编分工以范祖禹的加入为标志可分两阶段。第一阶段刘攽、刘恕两助手时期的长编分工是刘攽、刘恕分别负责两汉、魏晋南北朝长编,没有涉及到隋唐五代。范祖禹入局后第二阶段的新分工是刘攽、范祖禹、刘恕分别负责隋、唐、五代。The division of labour and the order of compilation of the Long Drafts of ZIZHITONGJIAN are two unresolved issues.The reason for the controversies is that scholars have different views on the writing time and content of the key historical materials,namely the“Xiushutie”and“A letter to Liu Daoyuan”written by Sima Guang to Fan Zuyu and Liu Shu respectively.In fact,Liu Shu's“Long Draft of Five Dynasties”mentioned in“A letter to Liu Daoyuan”is about the history of Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms instead of history of Five Dynasties before the Tang,and this long draft completed after the Long Draft of the Northern and Southern Dynasties.The process of compilation of TONGJIAN and the division of labour of compilation of Long Drafts could be divided into two periods.In the first period,the assistants of Sima Guang are Liu Ban and Liu Shu who were in charge of compilation of Drafts of Han Dynasty and Wei,Jin,Northern and Southern Dynasties separately,while in the second period,Fan Zuyu participated in compilation and compiled the history of Tang,while Liu Ban and Liu Shu compiled the history of Sui and Five Dynasties separately.

关 键 词：司马光 刘恕 《资治通鉴》 长编分修 五代长编 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]