检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:时玥 SHI Yue(Department of Law,Party School of the Sichuan Provincial Committee of CPC(Sichuan Institute of Administration),Chengdu,Sichuan 610071,China)
机构地区:[1]中共四川省委党校(四川行政学院)法学教研部,四川成都3610071
出 处:《地方治理研究》2025年第2期24-38,M0003,共16页Local Governance Research
摘 要:提高基层社会治理效能的关键在于实现秩序与活力的动态平衡,要坚持系统性、协同性、规范性、共识性的基层社会治理发展方向。基于“川善治”乡村治理平台的案例研究表明,数字平台以破解治理功能分散、治理主体分化、制度结构松散、价值理念分歧等基层社会治理困境为目标,从优化治理功能、协同治理主体、织密契约网络、重聚公共精神等方面促进乡村秩序与活力的动态平衡,提升基层社会治理效能。将数字技术引入乡村建设依然存在数字排斥、技术泛化和形式主义等问题,需要以数字技术驱动组织覆盖、制度创新和情感参与,从而实现基层社会协同共治。The key to improving social governance effectiveness at the primary level lies in achieving a dynamic balance between order and vitality and adhering to systemic,collaborative,normative,and consensus-driven directions for primary-level social governance development.A case study of the rural governance platform of"Chuan Shanzhi"demonstrates that digital platforms aim to address challenges such as fragmented governance functions,divided governance actors,loose institutional structures,and conflicting value systems in primary-level governance.By optimizing governance functions,coordinating stakeholders,tightening contractual networks,and revitalizing public spirit,digital platforms foster a dynamic equilibrium between rural order and vitality,thereby enhancing social governance effectiveness at the primary level.However,integrating digital technology into rural development still faces issues like digital exclusion,technological overreach,and formalism.To achieve co-governance at the primary level,it is necessary to leverage digital technology to drive organizational integration,institutional innovation,and emotional engagement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171