检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨子王
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学哲学与社会发展学院
出 处:《社会福利》2025年第1期13-23,共11页Social Welfare
摘 要:在社会工作服务项目的评估中,评估专家与社会工作者之间存在着权力关系。然而,评估专家只出现在最后的评估现场。在此之前,社会工作者所要做的是完成与评估相关的文书工作。受福柯规训、抵抗以及主体等概念的启发,文章通过深入分析G医院社会工作者的日常文书工作,发现“指标”变成了评估权力传递的媒介,并且在谈论的过程中对社会工作者形成了“话语的全景环绕”。但是,G医院社会工作者仍然可以在文书工作中选择“合规的变通”这一主体性逻辑。社会工作者普遍面对与“指标”相关联的文书工作,所以,“合规的变通”可以为社会工作者的主体性研究提供一种参考。In the evaluation of social work service projects,there exists a power dynamic between the evaluators and the social workers.However,the evaluators only appear at the final assessment.Prior to that,social workers are tasked with completing the documentation related to the evaluation.Drawing inspiration from Foucault's concepts of discipline,resistance,and subjectivity,the paper delves into the daily documentation of social workers at G Hospital.It finds that the"indicators"have become a vehicle for transmitting power in evaluations,creating a"panorama of discourses"that surrounds social workers during discussions.However,medical social workers at G Hospital are still able to choose"compliant flexibility"as a subjective logic in their documentation.As social workers today are commonly confronted with documentation tasks associated with"indicators",the concept of"compliant flexibility"can provide a reference for the study of social workers'subjectivity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49