检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李涵霄 杜杏叶[2,3] 曹珂瑞 LI Hanxiao;DU Xingye;CAO Kerui(Library of Beijing Sport University,48 Xinxi Road,Haidian District,Beijing 100084,China;National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,33 Beisihuan Xilu,Haidian District,Beijing 100190,China;Department of Information Resources Management,School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,33 Beisihuan Xilu,Haidian District,Beijing 100190,China)
机构地区:[1]北京体育大学图书馆,北京市100084 [2]中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市100190 [3]中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京市100190
出 处:《中国科技期刊研究》2025年第3期311-323,共13页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基 金:中国科学院自然科学期刊编辑研究会项目“国内外科技期刊平台数字学术服务现状研究”(YJH202209)。
摘 要:【目的】构建科学合理、可操作的科技期刊集群平台数字学术服务能力评价指标体系,为科技期刊集群平台更好地服务科学研究与学术出版、建设并提升数字学术服务能力提供理论指导与实践借鉴。【方法】基于能力成熟度模型建立科技期刊集群平台数字学术服务能力成熟度模型及等级体系;通过文献、案例调研和专家访谈,构建能力层次结构模型,析出关键能力要素,确定评价指标和各指标权重,并对国内外4个典型科技期刊集群平台实施测评。【结果】经过专家咨询与问卷调研后,确立科技期刊集群平台数字学术服务能力评价指标体系,包含3个维度、14个一级指标和37个二级指标,可用于实际测评。【结论】实证测评结果表明,本研究所建立的评价指标体系对科技期刊集群平台数字学术服务能力评价具有可行性,实证结果数据可为我国科技期刊集群平台数字学术服务能力建设与提升提供参考和借鉴。[Purposes]This study is committed to constructing a scientifically and operable evaluation index system for digital scholarship service capability of scientific journals cluster platform,providing theoretical guidance and practical reference for them to better serve scientific research and academic publishing,and to build and enhance digital scholarship service capabilities.[Methods]We established a capability maturity model and level description for digital scholarship service capability of scientific journals cluster platform based on capability maturity model.Then we established the capability hierarchy model by conducting literature review,case studies,and expert interviews,and identified key capability elements,determined evaluation indicators and their weights.Finally,we evaluated four typical cluster platforms of scientific journals.[Findings]The evaluation index system of the digital scholarship service capability of scientific journals cluster platform established after expert consultation and questionnaire survey includes 3 dimensions,14 primary indicators,and 37 secondary indicators,which can be used for practical evaluation.[Conclusions]Empirical evidence showed that the evaluation index system is feasible for evaluating the digital scholarship service capability of scientific journals cluster platform.The empirical data can serve as a reference for the construction and improvement of the digital scholarship capability of China's scientific journals cluster platform.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49