检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱晓阳 ZHU Xiaoyang(School of Sociology,Yunnan Minzu University;Department of Sociology,Peking University)
机构地区:[1]云南民族大学社会学学院 [2]北京大学社会学系
出 处:《社会》2025年第2期92-123,共32页Chinese Journal of Sociology
摘 要:本文从政治人类学的发问:“不以西方为出发点的‘政治学’何以可能”出发,提出政治生活中的“势”话说蕴含着其他选择途径之观点,进而从日常语言视角人类学入手讨论“势说”政治进路。本文在讨论理解“势说”政治的关键——日常语言视角论时,受到当代语言人类学和视角论人类学的启示,并特别以当代语言人类学的田野发现和文学翻译的“田野”经验作为支持。基于语言现象学所秉持的反还原论预设,本文将“地势”视为由一些相异成分以“中间链接”而成的“一般图景”,并在最后部分对“地势”作为实地研究方法进行了讨论。虽然“势说”政治或“地势”话说与一般社会科学研究方法论在本体论和认识论的根本预设上有所区别,但是在田野调查技术层面,两种范式是相互兼容的。基于此,本文以测度方法为例,对“地势”方法的具体运用进行了讨论。In political practices related to space,phrases such as“considering dishi”(考量地势)and“grasping dishi”(把握地势)are frequently employed by practitioners.The concept of dishi(地势,terrain)also serves as one of the expressions within the traditional Chinese political discourse of“shishuo”(势说,strategic positioning).This article begins with such everyday political language to discuss dishi within the broader context of contemporary social sciences.It starts with the political anthropological question of“how is‘political science’possible without taking the West as its departure?”,suggesting that the discourse of shishuo(势说)embedded in political life offers alternative pathways.By adopting an anthropological perspective rooted in everyday language,this study goes on to examine the political approach of shishuo,contrasting it with fundamental issues in Western social sciences,such as causal inference.The discussion of key elements in understanding shishuo--particularly the perspective of everyday language--draws inspiration from contemporary linguistic anthropology and perspectival anthropology,supported by ethnographic findings in linguistic anthropology and“fieldwork”experiences in literary translation.The study,grounded in the anti-reductionist premises of linguistic phenomenology,conceptualizes dishi as a“general picture”formed by the heterogeneous elements through“intermediary links”.It further argues that discourses of dishi often function as performative acts rather than descriptions of preexisting facts or conditions in the causal-inferential sense.In anthropological interventions,the discourse of shishuo and action are intertwined,rendering such discursive practices themselves methods for studying dishi.The final section explores dishi as a field research methodology.While the ontological and epistemological foundations of shishuo differ from those of mainstream social science methodologies,the paper contends that these paradigms--and even multiple paradigms--a
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49