超越“内卷”困境的尝试及其乌托邦属性——罗萨《不受掌控》的唯物史观审思  

Attempts to Transcend the Dilemma of"Involution"and Its Utopian Properties:A Historical Materialist Reflection on Rosa's Uncontrollability

作　　者：翟家慧 ZHAI Jiahui(School of Marxism,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学马克思主义学院,天津300350

出　　处：《理论建设》2025年第2期102-112,共11页Theory Construction

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“《德意志意识形态》的政治经济学批判逻辑及其当代价值研究”(22BKS004)。

摘　　要：在《不受掌控》一书中,罗萨以“掌控世界”为切入点对当代社会的内卷现象展开批判。在他看来,内卷本质上是个人力图掌控世界的一种行动策略,会导致个人深陷于不美好的生活困境之中。动态稳定原则是迫使个人被动进行内卷的结构动因,范围扩增的承诺是驱使个人主动进行内卷的文化动因。只有走向后增长社会,以适应性稳定原则代替动态稳定原则,以追求共鸣的新观念代替追求范围扩增的主流观念,才能超越内卷困境。从唯物史观分析,尽管罗萨超越内卷困境的理论尝试有其合理之处,却没有触及内卷的深层社会根源,即作为现代资本主义社会主导逻辑的资本逻辑,因而具有一定的乌托邦属性。In Uncontrollability,Rosa takes"controlling of the world"as an entry point to criticize the phenome-non of involution in contemporary society.According to Rosa,involution is essentially an action strategy of indi-viduals trying to control the world,which leads them to be trapped in the dilemma of a bad life.The principle of dynamic stability is the structural root that compels individuals to passively engage in involution,while the com-mitment to scope expansion is the cultural root that drives individuals to actively engage in involution.Only by moving towards to the post-growth society,replacing the dynamic stability principle with the adaptive stability principle,and replacing the dominant conception of scope expansion with a new conception of resonance,can we transcend the dilemma of involution.Although Rosa's theoretical attempt to transcend the involution dilemma has rational points from the perspective of historical materialism,it does not touch the deep social root of involu-tion,namely,the logic of capital as the dominant logic in modern capitalist society,and thus has a certain utopi-an properties.

关 键 词：内卷 掌控世界 适应性稳定 共鸣 唯物史观 

分 类 号：B152[哲学宗教—世界哲学]