检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:骆峰 LUO Feng(CHN Energy Longyuan Environmental Protection Co.,Ltd.,Beijing,100039)
机构地区:[1]国家能源集团龙源环保有限公司,北京100039
出 处:《能源科技》2025年第2期88-92,共5页Energy Science and Technology
摘 要:火力发电厂中,电动给水泵是最主要的耗电辅机设备,耗电量占厂用电率的30%,因此电动给水泵的节能改造对降低厂用电率具有重要意义。结合某2×200 MW火电机组电动给水泵改造案例,提出变频改造和齿轮优化改造方案。从节能效果、改造复杂程度、投资成本等方面对2种方案进行对比分析。相比较于变频改造方案,齿轮优化方案节能效果略低,年总节电率降低4%~6%,但其成本远低于变频方案,回收周期可缩短一半,并且运行的稳定性较高,综合性能较好。综上所述,推荐火力发电厂进行给水泵节能改造时优先考虑齿轮优化方案。In thermal power plants,electric feedwater pumps are the most energy-intensive auxiliary equip⁃ment,accounting for 30%of the auxiliary power consumption rate.Therefore,the energy-saving retrofit of these pumps is crucial for reducing auxiliary power consumption rate.This paper presents the variable fre⁃quency drive retrofit scheme and gear optimization scheme on the basis of a case study of the electric feed⁃water pump retrofit implemented at a 2×200 MW thermal power unit.A comprehensive comparison of the two schemes is carried out in terms of,among others,energy-saving effect,complexity of retrofit and cost of investment.The results reveal that while the gear optimization scheme achieves slightly lower energy savings(lower in annual total energy savings by 4%-6%)compared to the variable frequency drive retrofit scheme,it demonstrates far lower cost,50%shorter payback period,higher operational stability and better comprehensive performance.To sum up,the gear optimization scheme should be prioritized in energy-saving retrofit of feed⁃water pumps in thermal power plants.
分 类 号:TM621[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49