检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何春红 周刚[1] 陈震 HE Chunhong;ZHOU Gang;CHEN Zhen(School of Geography and Tourism,Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院,重庆401331
出 处:《地域研究与开发》2025年第2期129-134,142,共7页Areal Research and Development
基 金:重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(24SKJD070);重庆市教委科学技术研究项目(KJ1600331);重庆市重大决策咨询研究课题(2017-ZB06)。
摘 要:以典型山地城市重庆市中心城区、平原城市成都市中心城区为例,运用核密度分析与社会网络分析对两者旅游流网络结构进行了比较分析。结果表明:(1)自然、山地城市景点是重庆市旅游流到访的高频旅游节点;人文、特色城市景点是成都市旅游流到访的高频旅游节点。(2)重庆市旅游流空间上呈现“核心大聚集-边缘小聚集”结构,组团现象明显;成都市旅游流空间上呈现“核心聚集-边缘分散”结构,分散现象明显。(3)重庆市旅游流呈团状分布,重庆市旅游流与成都市旅游流相比,其网络密度较高;成都市旅游流受地理环境限制较小,空间上呈现“广而散”的特征,成都市旅游流网络聚类系数较重庆市高。(4)重庆市旅游流网络结构呈现单模块中心结构,强对流主要集中在中心模块内部节点之间;成都市旅游流呈现多模块中心结构,不同模块的核心节点相互流动。Taking a typical mountain city-Chongqing central urban area and a plain city-Chengdu central urban area as examples,a comparative analysis of the network structure of tourism flows in the two cities was conducted using kernel density analysis and social network analysis.The results showed that:(1)Natural and mountainous city attractions were the high-frequency tourism nodes visited by Chongqing Municipality;humanistic and characteristic city attractions were the high-frequency tourism nodes visited by Chengdu Municipality.(2)Chongqing tourism flow spatially presents the structure of“core large aggregation,edge small aggregation”,and the group phenomenon was obvious;Chengdu tourism flow spatially presents the structure of“core aggregation-edge dispersion”,and the phenomenon of dispersion was obvious.(3)Chongqing tourism flow was distributed in the form of a group,so Chongqing tourism flow compared Chengdu tourism flow,its network density was higher;Chengdu tourism flow was less restricted by the geographic environment,spatial presentation of the“wide and scattered”characteristics,so Chengdu tourism flow network clustering coefficient was higher than that of Chongqing.(4)The network structure of tourism flows in Chongqing presented a single-module central structure,with strong convection mainly concentrated between nodes within the central module;while the tourism flows in Chengdu presented a multi-module central structure,with the core nodes of different modules flowing with each other.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49