论设计的创造性本质  

On the Creative Nature of Design

作　　者：邓波[1] 韩茜[1] Deng Bo;Han Qian(Future College,Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology,Xi'an 710055,China)

机构地区：[1]西安建筑科技大学未来学院,西安710055

出　　处：《工程研究——跨学科视野中的工程》2025年第2期192-205,共14页JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING STUDIES

摘　　要：传统哲学基于绝对本质主义实体论和物理主义还原论的立场否定人工物在本体论意义上的存在,致使人工物存在论和知识论难以成立。人工物设计哲学也仅仅局限于方法论,历史的原因还导致艺术设计和工程设计的二元分立。批判和摒弃传统哲学绝对主义的立场,承认不可还原的新质事物的“涌现”,才能在存在论上确立事物“创造性”地存在起来的本质。从分析荷兰学派就人工物结构与功能之间存在“逻辑鸿沟”的发现中获得重大启示,进而认为正是由于人工物的“结构”“功能”“形态”之间不存在先验的逻辑必然关系,三者之间的关系才能在具体的、历史的过程中通过设计“创造性”地建构起来。设计在存在论上以“被动-主动综合”的机制得以发生,通过三条基本的设计路径,创造出人工物丰富多样的存在。艺术设计和工程设计也将在“结构”“功能”“形态”三维一体的设计中“创造性”地融合起来。Traditional philosophy,grounded in the positions of absolute essentialist substance theory and physicalist reductionism,denies the ontological existence of artificial objects,thereby rendering the ontology and epistemology of artifacts fundamentally untenable.The philosophy of artificial object design has long been confined to methodological discussions,with historical factors further exacerbating the binary division between artistic design and engineering design.Only by critiquing and rejecting the absolutist stance of traditional philosophy while acknowledging the"emergence"of irreducible novel qualities can we ontologically establish the essence of"creative"existence for entities.Analyzing the Dutch School's discovery of the"logical gap"between the structure and function of artificial objects provides significant enlightenment.It reveals that the absence of inherent logical necessity among"structure""function"and"morph"enables their relationships to be creatively constructed through design within concrete historical processes.Design emerges ontologically through a"passive-active synthesis"mechanism,generating diverse artificial existences via three fundamental design pathways.Consequently,artistic design and engineering design will achieve creative integration through trinity design encompassing"structure""function"and"morph"dimensions.

关 键 词：人工物 设计 创造性 被动-主动综合 

分 类 号：B01[哲学宗教—哲学理论]