日本学界近年对中美日关系认识的演变  

The Evolution of the History of Japanese Scholars'Understanding of China-Japan Relations in Recent Years

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:魏育邻 WEI Yulin(Faculty of Japanese Language and Culture,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510420,China)

机构地区:[1]广东外语外贸大学日语语言文化学院,广东广州510420

出  处:《杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期33-42,共10页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘  要:在中美关系极其复杂紧张的今日,了解日本学界近年发生的对中美日关系认识的演变不无裨益。近年来日本在中美日三国关系中自我定位的转变情况和原因,为何及如何从曾经出于自身的国家利益而保持相对平衡到今日积极站队美国的态势,值得加以关注。日本夹在中美两个大国之间,在美国从特朗普的孤立主义向拜登的重视同盟国的方针转换过程中,机会主义地改变对华关系认知和外交态度。而近年日本学界有关学者先后提出所谓“方案A”“方案B”和“方案A+”,官学双方对中美日关系的认识具有一种“异质同构”的关系。In today's extremely complex and tense relationship between China and the United States,it is helpful to understand the evolution of the understanding of Sino-Japanese relations in recent years.It can help us deepen the understanding of the tension nature between China and the United States and the internal problems of the United States itself,and better understand the change and reasons for Japan's self-positioning in the relationship between China and Japan.This includes the reasons for Japan's opportunistic change in its perception and diplomatic attitude towards China in the process of the transition from Trump's American Isolationism to Biden's Allies.This can provide us with a special perspective on the neighboring Japan sandwiched between China and the United States,how Japan once maintained a relative balance from its own national interests to actively stand in line or even lead the United States today,and provide a reference for US to handle China-Japan relations.With regard to this issue,the so-called“Scheme A”,“Scheme B”and“Scheme A+”(Plan A,Plan B and Plan A+)have been successively mentioned by relevant Japanese scholars in recent years,which deserve our attention.

关 键 词:日本学界 中美日关系 方案A 方案B 

分 类 号:D731.3[政治法律—政治学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象