检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Ningping MOU Xinli YUE Lingchen ZHAO Qian WANG
出 处:《Frontiers of Computer Science》2025年第3期1-13,共13页计算机科学前沿(英文版)
基 金:supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.U20B2049,U21B2018 and 62302344).
摘 要:Adversarial training has been widely considered the most effective defense against adversarial attacks.However,recent studies have demonstrated that a large discrepancy exists in the class-wise robustness of adversarial training,leading to two potential issues:firstly,the overall robustness of a model is compromised due to the weakest class;and secondly,ethical concerns arising from unequal protection and biases,where certain societal demographic groups receive less robustness in defense mechanisms.Despite these issues,solutions to address the discrepancy remain largely underexplored.In this paper,we advance beyond existing methods that focus on class-level solutions.Our investigation reveals that hard examples,identified by higher cross-entropy values,can provide more fine-grained information about the discrepancy.Furthermore,we find that enhancing the diversity of hard examples can effectively reduce the robustness gap between classes.Motivated by these observations,we propose Fair Adversarial Training(FairAT)to mitigate the discrepancy of class-wise robustness.Extensive experiments on various benchmark datasets and adversarial attacks demonstrate that FairAT outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of both overall robustness and fairness.For a WRN-28-10 model trained on CIFAR10,FairAT improves the average and worst-class robustness by 2.13%and 4.50%,respectively.
关 键 词:robust fairness adversarial training hard example data augmentation
分 类 号:TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49