谁更愿意使用生成式人工智能润色英文学术论文——一项基于论文作者单位所在国家/地区的研究  

Who is More Willing to Use Generative Artifical Intelligence for Polishing English-Language Academic Papers?A Study Based on Author Affiliations

作　　者：王勇臻 陈悦[1] Wang Yongzhen;Chen Yue(School of Public Administration and Policy,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116024,China)

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学公共管理学院,大连116024

出　　处：《文献与数据学报》2025年第1期48-59,共12页Journal of Library and Data

摘　　要：[目的/意义]深入调查生成式人工智能(GAI)在英文学术论文润色方面的应用现状,为进一步研究该技术在学术领域的扩散提供一定的参考。[方法/过程]以ChatGPT为案例,分别选取经由ChatGPT和人工进行润色的两组英文学术论文作为观测样本和对照样本,并以论文作者单位所在国家/地区作为切入点,通过逻辑回归模型定量比较英语国家/地区学者和非英语国家/地区学者对AI论文润色服务的偏好程度,进而检验学者的英语写作能力与其偏好使用的润色服务类型之间是否存在关联。[结果/结论]一篇英文学术论文有无英语国家/地区学者参与,与其实际接受的润色服务类型呈显著相关,有英语国家/地区学者参与的英文论文比无英语国家/地区学者参与的英文论文更可能借助ChatGPT予以润色。换言之,当需要润色英文学术论文时,英语写作能力较强的学者倾向于利用诸如ChatGPT之类的AI工具,而英语写作能力较弱的学者则倾向于寻求传统的人工方案。[Purpose/Significance]This study conducts an in-depth investigation into the application of Generative Artifical Intelligence(GAI)from the aspect of polishing English-language academic papers,aiming to provide a reference for further studies on the diffusion of GAI.[Method/Process]Taking ChatGPT as a case study,this study selects the English-language academic papers that claim to have been polished by ChatGPT and human editors as the observation sample and the sample for comparison,respectively.The author affiliations of these papers are used to infer whether related authors are from English-speaking countries/regions or not.Logistic regression models are built to quantitatively compare the preferences of scholars from English-speaking countries/regions and non-English-speaking ones towards AI-based(rather than human-based)polishing services for English-language academic papers,in order to examine if there is a correlation between scholars’English writing ability and the type of polishing services they prefer to apply to their English-language academic papers.[Result/Conclusion]Whether an Englishlanguage academic paper is authored by scholars from English-speaking countries/regions is significantly correlated with the type of the polishing service it actually receives.To be specific,ChatGPT is more likely to be applied to polish English-language academic papers authored by scholars from English-speaking countries/regions.In other words,scholars with strong English writing ability tend to utilize AI tools such as ChatGPT,while those with weak English writing ability tend to seek traditional human-based solutions to polish their English-language academic papers.

关 键 词：生成式人工智能 ChatGPT 英文学术论文 学术出版 作者单位 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学] G350