检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:干长姣 元延芳 郑杨 杨悦 房军 GAN Chang-jiao;YUAN Yan-fang;ZHENG Yang;YANG Yue;FANG Jun(National Medical Products Administration Institute of Executive Development,Beijing 100071,China;School of Pharmaceutical Science,Tsinghua University/Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Research and Evaluation,National Medical Products Administration,Beijing 100084,China)
机构地区:[1]国家药品监督管理局高级研修学院,北京100071 [2]清华大学药学院/国家药品监督管理局创新药物研究与评价重点实验室,北京100084
出 处:《中国新药杂志》2025年第8期790-796,共7页Chinese Journal of New Drugs
摘 要:目的:比较2023年中国和美国批准上市创新药和新药的异同点,以期为我国创新药研发提出建议。方法:比较2023年中国和美国批准上市创新药和新药的批准类型、持有人/生产商、靶点、适应证、是否采用加快上市注册程序等情况。结果:2023年我国共批准了40个创新药,适应证以抗肿瘤和免疫机能调节、抗感染用药为主,与美国相比,孤儿药研发不足。结论:我国新药研发实力和审评审批效率进一步提高,但创新研发体系仍需完善。Objective:To compare the similarities and differences of the innovative drug and novel drug approvals in China and the United States in 2023,in order to make suggestions for the research and development(R&D),review and approval policies of innovative drugs in China.Methods:The approval types,applicants/manufacturers,targets,indications,and whether to use one or more expedited programs were compared.Results:Forty innovative drugs were approved in China in 2023 and mainly are antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents and anti-infectives for systemic use.The orphan drug R&D is insufficient compared with the United States.Conclusion:The R&D strength of innovative drug and review and approval efficiency have been further improved in China,but the innovative research and development system still needs to be improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7