检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴虔 DAI Qian(Shijingshan Teaching Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing Shijingshan Hospital,Beijing 100043,China)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学石景山教学医院北京市石景山医院,北京100043
出 处:《延边大学医学学报》2025年第3期155-157,共3页Journal of Medical Science Yanbian University
基 金:山东省科技成果(编号:2024073)。
摘 要:目的:分析临床护理路径(CNP)联合集束化护理在急诊危重症患者急救中的应用效果。方法:选取首都医科大学石景山教学医院北京市石景山医院收治的100例急诊危重症患者,并将其中50例采用常规护理的患者设为对照组,另外50例采用CNP联合集束化护理的患者设为观察组。对比两组护理效果。结果:观察组急诊室停留时间、急救时间均明显短于对照组(P<0.05);护理后,观察组急性生理与慢性健康评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组抢救成功率、护理总满意率均明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:CNP联合集束化护理在急诊危重症患者急救中的应用效果较好。Objective:To analyze the application efficacy of clinical nursing pathway(CNP)combined with bundle care in emergency treatment of critically ill patients.Methods:A total of 100 emergency critically ill patients admitted to Beijing Shijingshan Hospital were selected.Among them,50 patients receiving routine care were assigned to the control group,while the other 50 patients receiving CNP combined with bundle care were assigned to the observation group.The nursing outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results:The observation group exhibited significantly shorter emergency room stay time and emergency treatment time compared to the control group(P<0.05).After nursing intervention,the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II(APACHE II)score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).Additionally,the success rate of resuscitation and total nursing satisfaction rate in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The combination of CNP and bundle care demonstrates favorable efficacy in emergency treatment of critically ill patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49