检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Haiyu Zhao Hongyu Zhou Wei Yao Qihang Zong Jinyu Wen
出 处:《Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy》2025年第1期3-14,共12页现代电力系统与清洁能源学报(英文)
基 金:supported by National Key R&D Program of China(No.2022YFB4202304)。
摘 要:Grid-following voltage source converter(GFLVSC)and grid-forming voltage source converter(GFM-VSC)have different dynamic characteristics for active power-frequency and reactive power-voltage supports of the power grid.This paper aims to clarify and recognize the difference between gridfollowing(GFL)and grid-forming(GFM)frequency-voltage support more intuitively and clearly.Firstly,the phasor model considering circuit constraints is established based on the port circuit equations of the converter.It is revealed that the voltage and active power linearly correspond to the horizontal and vertical axes in the phasor space referenced to the grid voltage phasor.Secondly,based on topological homology,GFL and GFM controls are transformed and mapped into different trajectories.The topological similarity of the characteristic curves for GFL and GFM controls is the essential cause of their uniformity.Based on the above model,it is indicated that GFL-VSC and GFM-VSC possess uniformity with regard to active power response,type of coupling,and phasor trajectory.They differ in synchronization,power coupling mechanisms,dynamics,and active power-voltage operation domain in the quasi-steady state.Case studies are undertaken on GFL-VSC and GFM-VSC integrated into a four-machine two-area system.Simulation results verify that the dynamic uniformity and difference of GFL-VSC and GFM-VSC are intuitively and comprehensively revealed.
关 键 词:Renewable energy grid-following converter grid-forming converter phasor method topological homology
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7