检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢帆 房梁 杨卫玲 王文瑶 XIE Fan;FANG Liang;YANG Weiling;WANG Wenyao(People's Procuratorate of Huashan District,Ma'anshan City,Ma’anshan 243002;School of Public Management&Law,AHUT,Ma’anshan 243002,Anhui,China)
机构地区:[1]马鞍山市花山区人民检察院,安徽马鞍山243001 [2]安徽工业大学公共管理与法学院,安徽马鞍山243002
出 处:《安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第5期34-36,共3页Journal of Anhui University of Technology:Social Sciences
基 金:2023年度安徽省检察理论研究课题:检察监督视角下行政争议实质性化解研究(WJ202354)。
摘 要:检察监督视角下的行政争议实质性化解是对以人民为中心理念的践行。部分行政争议案件相对人通过行政复议、行政诉讼、申请再审等多种救济途径但没有实质性解决争议,长期的“程序空转”不仅不能解决实际问题,而且浪费司法资源、损害司法权威。2019年检察机关开始探索行政争议实质性化解工作,经过几年的努力取得了一定成效,但实质性化解行政争议工作仍存在一些问题需要解决。本文分析了检察机关开展行政争议实质性化解工作存在的多种困境,提出完善实质性化解的对策。The substantive resolution of administrative disputes from the perspective of procuratorial oversight is the embodiment of the people-centered philosophy.In some administrative dispute cases,the parties involved have sought relief through administrative reconsideration,administrative litigation,and application for retrial,but the disputes have not been resolved in a substantive manner.The long-term“procedure inertia”not only fails to solve practical problems,increases the burden on the parties involved,but also wastes judicial resources and undermines judicial authority.In 2019,procuratorial organs began exploring the substantive resolution of administrative disputes,and after several years of efforts,they have achieved certain results.However,there are still some problems that need to be solved in the substantive resolution of administrative disputes.The paper analyzes the various dilemmas faced by procuratorial organs in carrying out the substantive resolution of administrative disputes and proposes countermeasures to improve the substantive resolution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171