检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:乔钰 QIAO Yu(School of Architecture,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
机构地区:[1]清华大学建筑学院,北京100084
出 处:《自然与文化遗产研究》2025年第2期4-13,共10页Study on Natural and Cultural Heritage
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“扩大社会力量参与文化遗产保护问题研究”(22ZDA085)。
摘 要:文章基于公众参与理论与中国文化遗产保护实践,初步探索社会力量参与的理论路径与实践策略。研究提出:社会力量参与需满足权益性、价值包容性、秩序性与过程性的实践要求,并结合典型案例分析,揭示当前参与机制碎片化、权益保障不足、参与路径有限、深度有限等问题,以及既有实践在特定条件下的解决方式。研究提出4项优化策略:依托基层群众自治性组织和社会组织构建基层协商平台;通过教育过程培育参与能力;建立权益保障制度平衡多元利益;推动政府主导与社会协同的治理模式转型。研究指出,社会力量参与既是文化权利实践,更是遗产价值传承与社会治理创新的双向赋能过程,需在制度设计、能力建设与文化认同培育层面系统推进。文章为构建文化遗产多元共治体系提供理论参考,对推动保护融入社会发展具有启示意义。Based on public participation theory and China's cultural heritage conservation practices,this paper preliminarily explores the theoretical frameworks and practical strategies for social forces’engagement in heritage conservation.The study proposes that social participation should meet four core criteria:the protection of rights and interests,inclusivity of values,orderliness,and process-oriented approach.Through the analysis of representative case studies,this paper highlights existing issues such as fragmented participation mechanisms,inadequate rights protection,limited access and depth of involvement,while also examining solutions developed under specific conditions in existing practices.Four optimization strategies are put forward:building grassroots consultation platforms relying on grassroots self-governing organizations and social groups;cultivating participatory capacities through education;establishing systems to protect rights and interests to balance diverse interests;and promoting a governance model that integrates government leadership and social collaboration.The research highlights that social participation represents both a practice of cultural rights and a bidirectional empowerment process for heritage value transmission and social governance innovation,requiring systematic advancement in system design,capacity building,and cultural identity cultivation.This study provides theoretical references for the development of a pluralistic governance system for cultural heritage and offers insights into integrating conservation into social development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70