植物抗逆能力评价方法研究进展  

Methods to evaluate plant tolerance to environmental stresses

作　　者：张舒欣 贾紫璇 方涛 刘一凡 赵微 王荣 昌海超 罗芳丽[1,4] 朱耀军 于飞海[7,8] Shuxin Zhang;Zixuan Jia;Tao Fang;Yifan Liu;Wei Zhao;Rong Wang;Haichao Chang;Fangli Luo;Yaojun Zhu;Feihai Yu(School of Ecology and Nature Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;School of Biological Sciences and Technology,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;Beijing Eco-mind Technology Co.,Ltd,Beijing 100085,China;Key Laboratory of Ecological Protection in the Yellow River Basin of National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Beijing 100083,China;Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration(Research Institute of Wetland),Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China;Zhanjiang National Research Station for Mangrove Wetland Ecosystem,Zhanjiang,Guangdong 524448,China;Institute of Wetland Ecology&Clone Ecology,Taizhou University,Taizhou,Zhejiang 318000,China;Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation,Taizhou University,Taizhou,Zhejiang 318000,China)

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学生态与自然保护学院,北京100083 [2]北京林业大学生物科学与技术学院,北京100083 [3]北京力科惠泽科技有限公司,北京100085 [4]黄河流域生态保护国家林业和草原局重点实验室,北京100083 [5]中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所(湿地研究所),北京100091 [6]广东湛江红树林湿地生态系统国家定位观测研究站,广东湛江524448 [7]台州学院湿地与克隆生态学研究所,浙江台州318000 [8]台州学院浙江省植物进化生态学与保护重点实验室,浙江台州318000

出　　处：《生物多样性》2025年第2期102-114,共13页Biodiversity Science

基　　金：第三次新疆综合科学考察项目(2022xjkk1200);国家自然科学基金(32371584,32071525)。

摘　　要：植物在长期适应环境胁迫的过程中,逐渐形成了与其生境相协调的形态、结构及生理等性状。研究表明可通过植物性状来评价植物的抗逆能力,且多性状比单一性状评价更为准确。对植物耐受能力评价的方法多样,各有优缺点,目前尚没有研究对这些方法进行比较分析。本研究收集了国内外近13年的相关文献,对目前常用的植物抗逆能力评价方法,即平均隶属函数值、聚类分析、基于隶属函数和权重的模糊综合评价(简称模糊综合评价)、主成分分析、隶属函数及主成分分析复合评价法(简称复合评价法)、卷积神经网络、灰色关联分析的概念、原理、关键步骤以及优缺点进行了分析和比较。分析发现以上方法均采用多性状来评价植物抗逆能力,其中,平均隶属函数值、模糊综合评价和复合评价法基于模糊数学理论,通过性状模糊化的方式建立模型;平均隶属函数值、主成分分析、复合评价法、灰色关联分析能筛选出关键抗逆性状。主成分分析和聚类分析可以提供直观、易懂的数据展示方式,有助于对抗逆能力评价结果的理解。以上方法可以在实践中相互补充,针对不同的研究目的和数据特征选择合适的评价方法。Aims:Plants are often exposed to environmental stresses.In order to survive,plants must adapt to these hostile environments by developing morphological,structural,and physiological traits that enable the plants to become compatible with their habitats.While there are many methods that would allow researchers can gain insight into the plants’adaptive strategies,there has not a comparative analysis of these methods.To fill this gap in the literature,we collected articles from the thirteen years on seven methods that are commonly used to evaluate plant stress tolerance:(1)average membership function value,(2)cluster analysis,(3)fuzzy comprehensive evaluation(based on membership function and weights),(4)principal component analysis,(5)composite evaluation(combining membership function and principal component analysis),(6)convolutional neural network,and(7)grey relational analysis.Our objectives are to examine these methods’main principles,key steps,advantages,and disadvantages.The overall goal is to select appropriate evaluation methods according to different research purposes and data characteristics,and to provide some theoretical basis for the accurate evaluation of plant resilience.Review results:Our results indicated that fuzzy mathematics is an important theoretical foundation in the three methods(i.e.,average membership function value,fuzzy comprehensive evaluation(based on membership function and weights),and composite evaluation(combining membership function and principal component analysis)are based on fuzzy mathematics theory).By using trait fuzzification,these methods enable researchers to establish models demonstrating how plant traits may affect plant resilience.We found that over half the models enable trait selection(i.e.,average membership function value,principal component analysis,composite evaluation(combining membership function and principal component analysis),and grey relational analysis).Conclusion:Average membership function value and gray relational analysis are often used for small sam

关 键 词：环境胁迫 耐受能力评价 植物性状 评价方法 

分 类 号：Q945[生物学—植物学]