分析的马克思主义的理论解构和实践启迪——以科恩与罗默的平等思想为例  

Theoretical Deconstruction and Practical Inspiration of Analytical Marxism——Taking the Equality Thought of Cohen and Roemer as an Example

作　　者：方丹[1] 黄燕 FANG Dan;HUANG Yan(School of Marxism(School of Law),Tarim University,Alaer 843300 China;Xinjiang Second Medical College,Karamay 834000 China)

机构地区：[1]塔里木大学马克思主义学院(法学院),新疆阿拉尔843300 [2]新疆第二医学院,新疆克拉玛依834000

出　　处：《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》2025年第3期9-15,共7页Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University

基　　金：2023年塔里木大学校级重大课题“新时代胡杨精神创新与实践研究”(ZL202303)。

摘　　要：作为分析的马克思主义学说代表人物,G.A.科恩与约翰·罗默两位学者虽然都聚焦于马克思和恩格斯的平等思想的“规范性”解读,但二人的平等思想却存在着很大的差异。科恩批判罗尔斯的自由主义平等,强调社会主义的实质平等原则需要得到实质性的体现,不能仅仅是形式上的平等。罗默则以市场社会主义的视角,探讨在市场机制中如何实现更为公平的机会分配。分析他们的平等思想理论内核异同,不仅可以为社会主义平等理念的实现提出可能的路径,同时也为今天的中国实现民族复兴提供实践启迪。As representatives of Analytical Marxism,scholars G.A.Cohen and John Roemer both focus on the“normative”interpretation of Marx and Engels’thoughts on equality,but there are significant differences in their views on equality.Cohen criticizes Rawls’liberal equality and emphasizes that the substantive equality principle of socialism needs to be substantially embodied,not just formal equality.In contrast,Roemer explores how to achieve a more equitable distribution of opportunities in the market mechanism from the perspective of market socialism.Analyzing the theoretical core,similarities,and differences of their thoughts on equality can not only propose possible paths for the realization of the socialist concept of equality,but also provide practical enlightenment for China's national rejuvenation today.

关 键 词：分析的马克思主义 科恩 罗默 平等思想 理论与实践 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]