发表前后同行评议视角下的学术论文创新性评价研究  

Innovation Evaluation of Academic Papers from the Perspective of Pre-and Post-Publication Peer Review

作　　者：唐晓波[1,2] 周瑞 吴佳琳 TANG XiaoBo;ZHOU Rui;WU JiaLin(Center for Information System Research,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,P.R.China;School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学信息系统研究中心,武汉430072 [2]武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《数字图书馆论坛》2025年第2期55-64,共10页Digital Library Forum

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于大数据的科教评价信息云平台构建和智能服务研究”(编号:19ZDA349)资助。

摘　　要：学术论文同行评议包括发表前的同行评议和发表后的同行评议,前者主要通过论文发表前的审稿意见体现,后者通过论文发表后的引证关系、开放同行评议平台的动态评价等体现。现有同行评议研究多集中于学术论文新颖性、影响力或颠覆性等单个指标的评价。为了更全面、客观地审查和评价学术论文创新性,提出一个结合论文发表前审稿意见和发表后引证关系的学术论文创新性评价模型。首先,构建并计算论文发表前审稿意见的创新性情感指标;其次,构建并计算论文发表后的引证关系指标;再次,在二维平面上基于发表前后的创新性指标绘制散点图;最后,构建基于区域划分的学术论文创新性评价模型。以国际学习表征会议论文为例进行实证研究,结果表明,使用该模型得到的结果与会议年度优秀论文推荐结果基本一致,验证了该方法的有效性。Peer review of academic papers includes pre-publication peer review and post-publication peer review.The former is mainly reflected through the review opinions before the publication of the paper,and the latter is reflected through the citation relationship after the publication of the paper and the dynamic evaluation of the open peer review platform.Most of the existing peer review studies focus on the evaluation of individual indicator such as novelty,impact,or subversiveness of academic papers.In order to review and evaluate the innovation of academic papers more comprehensively and objectively,this paper proposes an evaluation model for innovation of academic papers that combines pre-publication review opinions and post-publication citations.Firstly,the innovation sentiment index of the pre-publication review opinions of the paper is constructed and calculated.Secondly,the citation relationship index after publication is constructed and calculated.Then,the innovation indicators before and after publication are plotted as scatter plots on a two-dimensional plane.Finally,an innovation evaluation model of academic papers based on regional division is constructed.An empirical study is conducted using ICLR conference papers as an example.The empirical results show that the results obtained by the model are basically consistent with the results of the annual excellent paper recommendation of the ICLR,which verifies the effectiveness of the method.

关 键 词：同行评议 创新性 学术论文 审稿意见 引证关系 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学]