《方言》“誺,不知也”辨证  

Analysis and Certification on the Annotation"Chi(誺)means Buzhi(不知)"in Fangyan(方言)

作　　者：闫翠科 朱遥玲 YAN Cui-ke;ZHU Yao-ling(Beijing Institute of Chinese Ancient Literature-based Language and Cultural Inheritance,Beijing Language and Culture University,Beijing 100083,China;The College of Literature and Journalism,Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 611700,China)

机构地区：[1]北京语言大学北京文献语言与文化传承研究基地,北京100083 [2]四川大学文学与新闻学院,成都611700

出　　处：《语言研究》2025年第2期104-110,共7页Studies in Language and Linguistics

基　　金：教育部人文社科青年项目“《玉篇》残卷校理与研究”(21YJC740067);北京语言大学校级项目“11世纪以前中日文献中的《玉篇》佚文研究”(22YBB38)。

摘　　要：《方言》记录“不知”义的对应字应写作“■”,“誺”为“■”之形误。历代辞书对“■”“誺”的参差释义反映了“■”从讹变到“消失”的大致过程。学者们参考相同文献结论却大相径庭的现象也使此研究成为再次警示我们须全面正确使用语料的典型案例。The character meaning buzhi(不知)in Fangyan(方言)is chi(■)but chi(誺).In other words,"誺"is the error of"■".The different interpretive meanings of"■"and"誺"in the dictionaries of the past dynasties reflects the general process of"■"from falsehood to disappearance.And the fact that scholars draw very different conclusions from the same literature also makes this study a typical case once again to warn us of the need for comprehensive and correct use of language materials.

关 键 词：《方言》 “誺 不知也” ■ 《玉篇》 

分 类 号：H131[语言文字—汉语]