论耶吉和弗雷泽的资本主义批判理论之差异  

On the Differences between Jaeggi and Fraser's Capitalism Criticism Theory

作　　者：万宇君 徐瑾[1] Wan Yujun;Xu Jin

机构地区：[1]湖北大学哲学学院

出　　处：《理论界》2025年第4期55-62,共8页Theory Horizon

摘　　要：法兰克福学派第三代核心人物弗雷泽与第四代核心人物耶吉共同围绕资本主义问题展开了丰富对话与论辩,她们从反思资本主义批判传统和分析资本主义现实危机出发,主张对资本主义本身重新审视并建构了不同的批判理论。两位学者的理论差异主要集中在两个方面:一是对资本主义的不同理解,耶吉把资本主义建构为一种实践集合体的生活形式,而弗雷泽把资本主义看作一种制度化的社会秩序;二是批判资本主义的不同方法,耶吉采取整合功能主义、伦理和道德批判的内在批判方法,弗雷泽主张基于“前景一背景”模式的多重危机批判形式。Fraser and Jaeggi,thet third and fourth-generation core figures of the Frankfurt School respectively,have engaged in extensive dialogues and debates on capitalism.Starting from a reflection on the traditions of capitalism critique eand an analysis of its current crises,they advocate for a re-examination of capitalism itself and have constructed different critical theories.Their theoretical differences mainly focus on two aspects:firstly,their differing understandings of capitalism,with Jaeggi viewing capitalism as a form of life constituted by a collection of practices,while Fraser sees it as an institutionalized social order;secondly,their different methods of critiquing capitalism,with Jaeggi employing an intrinsic critique method that integrates functionalism,ethics,and morality,where as Fraser advocates for a multiple crisis critique based onthe"foreground-background"model.

关 键 词：资本主义 前景一背景 生活形式 危机批判 

分 类 号：B1[哲学宗教—世界哲学]