检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李军 梁雨昕 LI Jun;LIANG Yu-xin(School of History,Northwest University,Xi’an,Shaanxi,710127,China)
出 处:《史学集刊》2025年第3期74-83,共10页Collected Papers of History Studies
摘 要:石刻材料作为传世文献的重要补充,备受中古史学界重视。通过分析崔郸、令狐梅、裴夷直和牛僧孺等人的碑志材料,我们可以发现撰文者为了将当事人与失势的李德裕划清界限,同时也出于保护自身的考量,在相关碑志中掺入了不少虚构的史实。这种做法隐蔽性较强,从而给学者的研究带来了严重的干扰。学界在利用牛李党争背景下所生成的碑志材料时,不仅要挖掘其所提供的历史信息,而且要留意时局对石刻材料所产生的偏差性影响。As an important supplement to extant historical documents,epigraphic materials have attracted significant attention from scholars of medieval Chinese history studies.By analyzing the epitaph materials of figures such as Cui Dan,Linghu Mei,Pei Yizhi and Niu Sengru,it becomes evident that the authors,in order to separate the subjects from the disgraced person Li Deyu and to protect themselves,had added numerous fictionalized historical writings into these inscriptions.This practice,being relatively covert,had caused serious disruption and confusion to scholars’research.Therefore,when utilizing epitaph materials concerning conflicts between the political groups led by Niu and Li,scholars should not only explore the historical information those materials provided,but also be aware of the misleading effects of the political situation on epigraphic materials.
分 类 号:K877.4[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7