检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:季子然 JI Zi-ran
机构地区:[1]江南大学法学院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2025年第4期63-68,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
摘 要:在过去的几十年中,我国知识产权法律规范迅速发展并取得了很大成就。著作权法通过保护作品、鼓励创作、维护作品创作价值的方式,推动了我国科学文化事业的发展,但在司法实践中仍存在规定不明、缺乏具体判断标准的问题。分析最高人民法院发布的著作权五大指导案例,结合独创性原则和可分离性原则,提出一套独创性判断标准和可分离原则在具体适用时的方法,以期著作权法得到更好地实施。Over the past few decades,China’s intellectual property legal framework has developed rapidly and achieved significant accomplishments.The Copyright Law has promoted the advancement of scientific and cultural endeavors by protecting works,encouraging creation,and safeguarding the value of creative works.However,in judicial practice,issues such as ambiguous provisions and a lack of specific judgment standards still persist.By analyzing the five guiding cases on copyright published by the Supreme People’s Court and integrating the principles of originality and separability,this study proposes a set of standards for judging originality and methods for applying the principle of separability in specific cases,with the aim of facilitating better implementation of the Copyright Law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7