检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余晓 戴阳锋 陈迁 孙莹 YU Xiao;DAI Yangfeng;CHEN Qian;SUN Ying
机构地区:[1]中国计量大学经济与管理学院
出 处:《国际贸易问题》2025年第4期56-73,共18页Journal of International Trade
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“RCEP协定框架下我国认证认可体系与国际对接的机制研究”(21BJY222)。
摘 要:通过增加经济体之间的数字贸易来加强区域一体化需要在数字治理方法上找到共同点,厘清各国的数字治理分歧是重要前提。本文基于区域数字贸易一体化指数量化了亚太区域20个经济体2012—2021年的数字治理分歧,并检验其对数字服务出口的影响及机制。研究结果表明:数字治理分歧对数字服务出口具有显著的抑制作用,使用工具变量缓解内生性后,其结果依然稳健;机制分析显示,数字治理分歧通过扩大制度距离限制数字服务出口,而签订区域贸易协定数字贸易规则、加强数字技术交流能有效缩短制度距离并缓解数字治理分歧的不利影响;异质性分析显示,数字治理分歧的出口抑制效应在高收入国家表现得更明显,且出口抑制作用主要体现在跨境数据管理、互联网中介责任和内容访问等三方面的政策中,并且只有当贸易双方的经济水平相近时,区域贸易协定的制度优化效应才会随着数字贸易规则深度的增加而放大。本文的经验证据有助于理解亚太经济体在数字治理政策中的偏好和立场,为促进区域数字贸易一体化、完善全球数字治理提供了建议。Strengthening regional integration by increasing digital trade between economies requires finding common ground in digital governance approaches,and clarifying the differences in digital governance between countries is an important prerequisite.Based on the regional digital trade integration index,this paper quantifies the digital governance divergence of 20 economies in the Asia-Pacific region from 2012 to 2021,and examines its impact and mechanism on digital service exports.The results show that digital governance divergence has a significant inhibitory effect on digital service exports,and the results are still robust after using instrumental variables to alleviate endogeneity.The mechanism analysis shows that digital governance divergence restricts the export of digital services by expanding the institutional distance,while the signing of regional trade agreements of digital trade rules and strengthening digital technology exchanges can effectively shorten the institutional distance and alleviate the adverse impact of digital governance divergence.Heterogeneity analysis shows that the export inhibition effect of digital governance divergence is more obvious in high-income countries.The export inhibition effect is mainly reflected in the policies of cross-border data management,internet intermediary responsibility as well as content access,and only when the economic levels of the two trading parties are similar,the institutional optimization effect of regional trade agreements will be amplified with the increase of the depth of digital trade rules.The empirical evidence in this paper is helpful to understand the preferences and positions of Asia-Pacific economies in digital governance policies,and provides suggestions for promoting regional digital trade integration and improving global digital governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49