“对标”:解码城市政府行为选择与竞争关系的新维度  

"Benchmark":A New Dimension for Understanding the Behavioural Choices and Competition of Urban Governments in China

作　　者：黄杰 厉凌云[3] HUANG Jie;LI Lingyun

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学国际事务与公共管理学院,山东青岛266100 [2]中国海洋大学公共安全与风险治理研究所,山东青岛266100 [3]复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院,上海200433

出　　处：《学习与实践》2025年第4期54-66,共13页Study and Practice

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“重大公共危机应对中制度优势转化为治理效能的机制与经验研究”(项目编号:21YJA810005)。

摘　　要：近年来,“对标”被党政机关广泛运用于政治实践中。在竞争日趋激烈的背景下,“对标”成为许多城市政府追求竞争优势的一种行为选择和府际“学习-竞争”机制的一种运作表现。在实际操作中,“对标”概念具有指导理念、竞争策略和政治话语等三重性质指向,“对标”行为包括“寻标-对标-达标-夺标”四个环节。基于“广义政府”视角,党政关系构成了理解城市政府“对标”行为的深层政治逻辑。城市政府试图通过对标先进,寻求更成熟高效的发展路径,但所谓的成功经验能否被复制仍有待检验,“对标”的行为导向与最终效果也需被审慎对待。In recent years,"Benchmark"has been widely used in political practice by the Party and government.Against the background of increasingly fierce competition in cities,"Benchmark"has become a kind of behavior choice for many urban governments in China to pursue competitive advantage and an operational performance of inter-governmental"Learning-competition"mechanism.Based on three typical cases,this paper finds that the concept of"Benchmark"has three characteristics:guiding concept,competitive strategy and political discourse,and the behavior of"Benchmark"includes four segments:seeking,marking,reaching,and winning.From the perspective of"general government",party-government relations constitute a deep political logic to understand the"Benchmark"of urban government.The urban government tries to find a more mature and efficient development path through"Benchmark",but whether the so-called successful experience can be copied remains to be tested.At the same time,the behavioral orientation and ultimate benefits of the"Benchmark"deserve to be treated with caution.

关 键 词：对标 城市治理 地方政府行为 地方政府竞争 

分 类 号：D630[政治法律—政治学]