中国与中亚经贸深度合作制度范式选择  

Institutional Paradigm Selection for Deepening China-Central Asia Economic and Trade Cooperation

作　　者：胡晓红[1] Hu Xiaohong(School of Law,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,Jiangsu,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《伊犁师范大学学报》2025年第1期11-22,F0002,共13页Journal of Yili Normal University

基　　金：2024年度国家社会科学基金西部项目“美国涉疆法案对中国企业的影响及法律应对研究”(24XFX018)。

摘　　要：中国-中亚五国外交、经济、社会关系已经走过了30多年的历程,彼此经贸关系也呈稳步发展态势,是促进“全球南方”协作的典范之一。但是美国的地缘政治观与相关“硬制度”安排正在输入中亚地区,给中亚地区稳定带来威胁。尽管中亚五国积极响应共建“一带一路”倡议,但倡议“外化”为系列双边规范性文件,其国际“软法”法律约束力的有限性对于构建“周边命运共同体”的激励不足,与美国推动的区域贸易协定的“硬法”模式博弈相较具有局限性。因而推动达成具有国际“硬法”效力的中国-中亚区域自由贸易协定应是维护中国-中亚五国安全、稳定的制度选择,也是高质量共建“一带一路”的制度供给所需。China's diplomatic,economic,and social relations with the five Central Asian countries have evolved over more than three decades,with their economic and trade ties demonstrating steady growth,serving as a model for promoting cooperation within the"Global South".However,the U.S.geopolitical perspective and related"hard"institutional arrangements are being introduced into Central Asia,posing a threat to regional stability.Although the five Central Asian countries have actively responded to the Belt and Road Initiative(BRI),the initiative has largely been externalized into a series of bilateral normative documents.The limited legal binding force of such international"soft law"provides insufficient incentives for building a"Community of Shared Future for Neighboring Countries",revealing its constraints when compared with the"hard law"model of regional trade agreements(RTAs)promoted by the U.S.Therefore,advancing a China-Central Asia regional trade agreement with the force of international"hard law"should be the institutional choice for safeguarding security and stability between China and the five Central Asian nations,as well as a necessary institutional supply for the high-quality development of the BRI.

关 键 词：中国-中亚 “硬制度” 区域贸易协定 周边命运共同体 

分 类 号：F752.7[经济管理—国际贸易]