汉语原因型动结式论元实现的句法生成分析  

A Generative Analysis of Arguments Realization in Chinese Causative Resultative Constructions

作　　者：邱林燕 Qiu Linyan(School of Foreign Languages,Jiangxi Agricultural University,Nanchang 330045,China)

机构地区：[1]江西农业大学外国语学院,江西南昌330045

出　　处：《现代语文》2025年第1期59-68,共10页Modern Chinese

基　　金：江西省社会科学基金项目“形态与句法关系视域下汉语动结式和日语结果复合动词的生成研究”(23YY13);江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目“生成建构主义视域下汉语原因型动结式与主宾可换位动结式的生成研究”(YY22207)。

摘　　要：汉语一元动结式具有两种类型:反身型和被动型,其中,只有反身型一元动结式能够与原因型动结式构成“自动—致使”交替关系。同时,原因型动结式的原因主语NP与动结式的前项V1保持“V(于)NP”语法关系。基于这些语言事实,对一元动结式和原因型动结式的句法结构进行分析。反身型一元动结式是前项词根√V1与BECOME合并的非宾格结构;被动型一元动结式的句法结构中,词根√V1与CAUSE合并,而且存在无语音形式的空外论元;原因型动结式是在反身型一元动结式的非宾格结构基础上派生而成的,即词根√V1与BECOME合并获得动词的句法属性后,动词V1内合并于CAUSE,CAUSE-V1共同导入原因论元。In Chinese there are two different types of intransitive resultative constructions:reflexive and passive.Only the reflexive resultative constructions hold intransitive-causative alternating relation with causative resultative constructions.The causee of causative resultative construction and V1 must be able to form a syntactic relation of“V1 NP(or V1 in NP)”.Based on these facts,we conducted a generative analysis of the syntactic structures of the intransitive resultative constructions and causative resultative constructions.In reflexive resultative constructions the root√V1 merges with the light verb BECOME.In passive resultative constructions the root√V1 merges with the light verb CAUSE,and there is null external argument in the structure.In the formation of causative resultative constructions,the root√V1 merges with BECOME then V1 moves and merges with CAUSE,CAUSE-V1 introduce the causee.

关 键 词：原因型动结式 一元动结式 论元实现 轻动词合并 句法生成 

分 类 号：H146.3[语言文字—汉语]