20世纪初“新史学”与中国史学社会科学化  

“New Historiography”in the Early 20th Century and Social Scientization of Chinese Historiography

作　　者：李政君 Li Zhengjun

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学历史学院 [2]中国历史研究院历史理论研究所

出　　处：《历史研究》2025年第2期145-171,M0007,共28页Historical Research

基　　金：中国社会科学院青年人才“培远计划”资助项目阶段性成果。

摘　　要：20世纪初的“新史学”为中国史学社会科学化进程的开启提供一定可能,但本身不属于真正意义上的社会科学化。史学社会科学化重在借鉴社会科学理论和知识,解释历史的发展演变,而“新史家”将社会科学知识移作“新史”书写内容、将相关学科方法作为史料考订辅助的观念,表明他们对“借鉴”的认知具有多元性和不确定性。而且他们的历史书写更偏重通过重整中国历史叙事展示或佐证社会进化论,错置了史学和社会科学理论的关系。中国史学社会科学化实际兴起于五四时期,而其面貌至社会史论战时期才得到相对完整的呈现。The“New Historiography”in the early 20th century provided some potential for initiating the social scientization process of Chinese historiography,but it did not constitute a true form of social scientization.The social scientization of histori ography emphasizes the application of social science theories to explain the evolution of history.However,the“New Historians”primarily incorporated social science knowledge as substantive content for“New History”narratives and adopted interdisciplinary methods as auxiliary means for verifying historical materials.It reflects the diversity and indeterminacy in their cognizance of“theoretical borrowin g”.Moreover,their historical narratives prioritized reorganizing China’s historical accounts to demonstrate or corroborate social evolutionism,thereby misplacing the relationship between historiography and social science theories.The social scientization of Chinese historiography actually emerged during the May Fourth period,but its full form was not relatively complete until the period of controversy on China’s social history.

关 键 词：“新史学” 史学社会科学化 鲁滨孙 唯物史观 社会史论战 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]