检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘圣楠 刘艺灵 LIU Sheng-nan;LIU Yi-ling(Quanzhou Intermediate People's Court,Quanzhou,362000,China;Tan Siu Lin Business School,Quanzhou Normal University,Quanzhou,362000,China)
机构地区:[1]福建省泉州市中级人民法院,福建泉州362000 [2]泉州师范学院陈守仁商学院,福建泉州362000
出 处:《福建金融管理干部学院学报》2025年第1期31-38,共8页Journal of Fujian Institute of Financial Administrators
摘 要:金融纠纷由于体量庞大而成为纠纷化解亟待攻克的重点工程。为应对金融纠纷处置的现实要求和挑战,构建金融纠纷线上仲裁解决机制(ODA)成为一种创新的解决方案。通过借鉴英国、加拿大及本土的线上纠纷解决模式,指出在司法实践中从“ADR”到“ODR”再到“ODA”的纠纷调处机制提升路径,创设性提出金融纠纷线上仲裁解决机制(ODA)的系统性制度体系建构。Financial disputes,owing to their substantial volume,have emerged as a critical programme re-quiring urgent attention in dispute resolution.To address the practical demands and challenges associated with financial disputes,the establishment of an Online Dispute Arbitration(ODA)mechanism represents an innovative resolution.By drawing on the online dispute resolution models of jurisdictions such as the practices in the UK and Canada,as well as practices in China,this paper delineates the evolutionary path of dispute resolution machanisms in judicial practices progressing from Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR)to Online Dispute Resolution(ODR),and ultimately advancing to ODA.It further proposes a sys-tematic institutional framework for the ODA mechanism tailored specifically for financial disputes.
关 键 词:金融纠纷 非诉讼纠纷解决机制(ADR) 线上纠纷解决机制(ODR) 线上仲裁解决机制(ODA)
分 类 号:D922.280.4[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171