法教义学与社科法学的“科际合作”--以后果考量为中心的分析  

"Interdisciplinary collaboration"between legal dogmatics and law as a social science:a focus on the consequence consideration

作　　者：王彬[1] WANG Bin(School of Law,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350

出　　处：《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2025年第3期249-256,共8页Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BFX033)。

摘　　要：在裁判理论上,法教义学与社科法学的分歧集中表现为“规则至上”还是“后果导向”的问题,但是,这一理论对立的背后隐藏着社科法学对法教义学的深深误解。社科法学所主张的普遍的后果考量,存在着越法裁判的风险。为了防范这一风险,需要加强社科法学与法教义学的“科际合作”。一方面,社科法学通过经验性实证、因果性判断、系统性考察等方式来归纳和发展教义,从而通过后果考量证立法律教义。另一方面,法教义学通过规范性评价、融贯性调控、体系性建构等方式将后果考量纳入自身框架,从而通过教义驯化后果。In the judicial theory,the divergence between legal dogmatics and law as a social science is epitomized by the debate between the"rule-first"and"consequentialist".However,behind this theoretical opposition exists a profound misunderstanding of legal dogmatics from law as a social science.The universal consideration of consequence advocated by law as a social science study carries the risk of yielding judgments that deviate from the law.In order to mitigate this risk,it is imperative to enhance the interdisciplinary collaboration between legal dogmatics and law as a social science.On the one hand,law as a social science generalizes and develops doctrine through empirical demonstration,causal judgment,systematic investigation and other ways,so as to prove legal doctrine through the consequence consideration.On the other hand,legal dogmatics can incorporate the consequence consideration into its own framework through normative evaluation,coherent regulation and systematic construction,so as to domesticate consequence through doctrine.

关 键 词：法教义学 社科法学 后果考量 科际合作 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]