来世再造与灵性反哺:论数字交往视野下的AI“复生”  

Reconstruction of the Afterlife and Re-feeding of the Spirituality:Research on AI Resurrection from the Perspective of Digital Association

作　　者：李丹 Li Dan(School of Journalism and Communication,Nanjing University)

机构地区：[1]南京大学新闻传播学院,江苏南京210000

出　　处：《新闻界》2025年第3期83-96,共14页

摘　　要：AI“复生”与生者的互动是一种跨生命式的数字交往实践。本研究认为:(1)AI“复生”通过双向悼念而形成的“显形的幽灵”身份,实质是一种由算法怀旧产生的复古商品,拓展了数字来世的含义;(2)生者与AI“复生”的交往,是一种获得神圣体验、促进生命的共同演化,以及持续开发创造性生存方式的技术-精神实践,助力生者超越当前的认知与生存形式,揭示出数字交往的灵性特点;(3)基于数字交往的价值理性“普遍联结”而言,AI“复生”只是有限的复制品,与生者的互动违背了数字正义,无法形成互惠开放的对话,并制造了交往的“自反性沉迷”。因此,对AI“复生”的使用应是一种应对丧亲之痛的过渡性体验,而非长期的陪伴旅程。The interaction between AI resurrection and the living is a cross-life digital association practice.This study shows that:(1)the AI resurrection is based on digital remains and forms the identity of a“visible ghost”through two-way mourning.Essentially,it is a retro commodity generated by algorithmic nostalgia,expanding the meaning of the digital afterlife.(2)The association between the living and AI resurrection is a techno-spiritual practices that provides a sense of divinity,promotes the co-evolution of life,and continuously develops creative ways of existence,helping human being to transcend current cognition and the forms of living existence,and revealing the spirituality of digital association.(3)Based on the Universal Connection,which is the value rationality of digital association,AI resurrection is a limited replica,accompanied by controversies of violating digital justice,failing to form a mutually beneficial and open dialogue,creating a reflexive addiction to association.Therefore,the use of AI resurrection should be a transitional experience to cope with the bereavement,rather than a long-term companionship experience.

关 键 词：AI“复生” 数字交往 数字来世 灵性 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]