ChatGPT能否读心:证实或证伪?  

Can ChatGPT Read Minds:Confirming or Falsifying?

作　　者：胡婉蕾 HU Wanlei(College of Philosophy,Anhui University,Hefei,Anhui 230039,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学哲学学院,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《宜宾学院学报》2025年第4期64-73,82,共11页Journal of Yibin University

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目(23CZX055);安徽大学质量工程项目(2022xjzlgc071)。

摘　　要：ChatGPT经过不断地更新迭代,已经能自动生成更加流畅、高质量的自然语言文本。当进一步探讨该模型能否恢复人类思维和AI之间的隐喻联系时,实证主义者和证伪主义者就在“ChatGPT能否读心”这一问题上引发了争论,二者都为该命题提供了验证方法,但无论是前者的“或然性”归纳证实,还是后者的“概率性”演绎证伪,都有其自身的局限性,这两种不可靠的路径,均无法对“ChatGPT能读心”这一假设进行全面且确切的回应。因此,我们唯有以审慎的态度来面对这一命题,方能更全面地认识ChatGPT等人工智能,实现技术真正造福人类的目标。ChatGPT has been continuously updated to automatically generate more fluent,high-quality natural language text.Empiricists and falsificationists have sparked a debate on the question of“whether ChatGPT can read minds”when it has been further explored whether the model can recover the metaphorical link between human minds and AI.Both sides offer approaches to verify this proposition,but both the former’s“contingent”inductive confirmation and the latter’s“probabilistic”deductive falsification have their own limitations,and neither of these two unreliable paths is able to provide an answer to the question.Neither of these two unreliable paths can provide a comprehensive and definitive response to the proposition that“ChatGPT can read minds.”Therefore,only by approaching this issue with prudence can people develop a holistic understanding of AI technologies like ChatGPT and ensure that technological advancements genuinely serve the benefit of humanity.

关 键 词：读心 证实 证伪 或然性推论 概率演绎 

分 类 号：B089.2[哲学宗教—哲学理论] N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]