检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯文亭 Hou Wenting(Schol of Physical Education,Shandong Normal University,Jinan 250358,China)
出 处:《体育科技文献通报》2025年第3期20-25,共6页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology
摘 要:本文采用文献资料法、录像观察法、数理统计法、比较研究法、逻辑分析法等研究方法,分析对比巴黎奥运会男子800 m跑决赛8名运动员在速度节奏和战术选择上的差异,总结男子800 m跑的速度节奏对比赛成绩的影响以及不同赛次战术的运用特征。研究发现:(1)在不同的比赛中,800 m跑运动员的速度节奏需结合比赛类型、竞技水平、比赛环境等因素进行定义。(2)途中跑(200~600 m)和冲刺跑(600~800 m)阶段与比赛成绩有较强相关性(P<0.05);后半程用时(第2个400 m用时)与比赛成绩呈显著相关(P<0.01),需加强速度保持、速度耐力训练。(3)不同赛次运动员根据自身差异保持统一或变换战术。为确保战术的顺利执行,运动员需要提高在比赛中的应对能力,并综合考虑多重因素。This study employs literature research method,video analysis,statistical methods,comparative analysis,and logical reasoning to examine differences in pacing strategies and tactical choices among eight finalists in the men's 800m final at the Paris Olympics.It aims to summarize the impact of pacing strategies on performance and characterize the application of tactical approaches across competition stages and race phases.Key findings include:(i)800-Meter athletes must tailor pacing strategies to competition stage,competitive level,and environmental conditions.(ii)The mid-race phase(200-600m)and final sprint phase(600-800m)demonstrated strong correlations with race outcomes(P<0.05).Notably,second-lap performance(time for the final 400m)showed a highly significant correlation(P<0.01),underscoring the need for targeted speed maintenance and endurance training.(iii)Athletes maintained or adjusted tactics across competition stages based on individual strengths and contextual factors.Successful execution requires enhanced adaptability and multifactorial decision-making during competition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49