阿湖水库除险加固设计方案比选与决策  

Comparative Analysis and Decision-Making for Reinforcement Design Schemes of Ahu Reservoir

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:白阳[1] BAI Yang(Xinjiang Water Resources and Hydropower Survey and Design Institute Co.,Ltd.,Urumqi 830000,China)

机构地区:[1]新疆水利水电勘测设计研究院有限责任公司,新疆乌鲁木齐830000

出  处:《红水河》2025年第2期38-42,48,共6页

基  金:新疆水利水电勘测设计研究院有限责任公司科技项目(SLSJY-研2422)。

摘  要:笔者对阿湖水库除险加固问题进行深入研究。通过分析水库存在的主要问题,提出三种除险加固设计方案,并从地质条件、调洪成果、工程布置、施工条件、工程量及投资等多个角度对这些方案进行详细比较分析。结果表明:方案一存在坝顶及防浪墙高程不足等问题;方案二通过增加溢洪道宽度来增强泄流能力,但投资较大;方案三在调洪能力、工程布置和施工条件等方面表现出较好的平衡,不过因石方开挖量较大导致投资成本有所增加,但综合考量各项因素后,优势依然明显。基于上述分析,推荐方案三作为最优方案,以期为后续的水库除险加固提供科学依据。makes an in-depth study on the reinforcement of Ahu Reservoir.By analyzing the main problems existing in the reservoir,three kinds of reinforcement design schemes are put forward,and these schemes are compared and analyzed in detail from the aspects of geological conditions,flood control results,engineering layout,construction conditions,engineering quantity and investment.The results show that SchemeⅠhas the problems of insufficient elevation of dam crest and wave wall;SchemeⅡenhances discharge capacity by widening the spillway but requires higher investment;SchemeⅢdemonstrates better balance in flood regulation capacity,engineering layout,and construction conditions.Although increased rock excavation volume leads to elevated investment costs,it still shows significant overall advantages after comprehensive consideration of all factors.Based on the above analysis,Scheme Ⅲ is recommended as the optimal solution,providing scientific reference for the subsequent reservoir reinforcement.

关 键 词:阿湖水库 除险加固 方案比选 调洪成果 工程布置与施工 工程量与投资 

分 类 号:TV697.3[水利工程—水利水电工程]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象