检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余友谊 梁瑾 李璁 冼芳任 兰霞 YU Youyi;LIANG Jin;LI Cong;XIAN Fangren;LAN Xia(China Energy Engineering Group Guangxi Electric Power Design Institute Co.,Ltd.,Nanning 530007,China)
机构地区:[1]中国能源建设集团广西电力设计研究院有限公司,广西南宁530007
出 处:《红水河》2025年第2期43-48,共6页
摘 要:某光伏项目位于沿海滩涂及近海海域,场址涨潮时被淹没,退潮时部分露出海面。笔者根据场地地形、地质、浪高、流速和风速等条件,研究适用于近海环境的光伏支架基础方案及结构形式,并从受力特征、施工工艺及运维管理等维度,对固定支架、柔性支架与漂浮系统开展技术经济性比较。通过对比分析,经论证表明:该场址采用固定支架、柔性支架及漂浮系统均具有技术可行性;其中漂浮系统兼具施工周期短与造价优势,故推荐采用漂浮系统方案。A photovoltaic project is located in coastal tidal flats and offshore areas,where the site is submerged during high tide and partially exposed at low tide.Based on terrain,geological conditions,wave height,flow velocity,wind speed,and other factors,the authors investigate foundation solutions and structural configurations for photovoltaic support systems suitable for offshore environments.A technical-economic comparison is conducted among fixed support systems,flexible support systems,and floating systems from perspectives of mechanical characteristics,construction techniques,and operation and maintenance management.Analysis demonstrates that the use of fixed supports,flexible supports,and floating systems are technically feasible for this site.Among them,the floating system offers advantages in shorter construction periods and lower costs,making it the recommended solution.
分 类 号:TM615[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7